2025-12-27 17:22:58

Turns out building this in plain vanilla JavaScript instead of reaching for React can actually work pretty well. Who knew?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiTooHigh

· 2025-12-30 17:20

Vanilla JS is indeed awesome. Not everything has to be on React; sometimes it's actually a burden.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 2025-12-29 17:08

Huh? Vanilla JS can work? How did I not think of that, haha

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 2025-12-29 13:48

Haha, I told you, sometimes the simplest solutions are the most awesome. Why do we need so many frameworks?

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 2025-12-27 17:52

Haha, no way, vanilla JS can actually do this efficiently... Framework addiction is acting up again.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 2025-12-27 17:42

Is vanilla JS not good enough? Why make it so complicated... I just realized it too.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 2025-12-27 17:42

Pure JS can actually work? React fans must be feeling uncomfortable now haha

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 2025-12-27 17:37

Wow, can vanilla JS really do it? Doesn't that mean React might be over-engineered? Thinking about those gas fee optimization tricks, sometimes the most straightforward solutions end up earning the most...

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 2025-12-27 17:33

No, can vanilla JS really do it? I always thought you'd have to write a bunch of boilerplate without React.

View OriginalReply0