2025-12-26 16:23:52

与其等着钱包被攻击后再慌张补救，不如提前把架构问题理清楚。太多项目和用户都是等出事了才开始反思安全设计，到那时已经亡羊补牢。钱包的安全防护、多签方案、权限隔离这些基础建设，早做总比晚做强。

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GraphGuru

· 12-28 02:26

Really, a bunch of projects are just hoping for luck until they get stabbed and finally realize.

View OriginalReply0

StableGenius

· 12-27 22:27

lmao everyone saying this like they didn't already get rekt once. empirically speaking, the ones who actually implement proper multisig architecture are the ones still holding their keys in 2025.

Reply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 12-26 16:48

Oh no, it's another case of armchair quarterbacking... But it's also quite true. I've seen too many big players get liquidated because they were lazy.

View OriginalReply0

DefiVeteran

· 12-26 16:38

Damn, those words are so blunt. I'm the kind of person who only reacts after something happens... --- Multi-signature really needs to be set up early, or else you'll lose everything in one cut. --- That's right, but the reality is most people won't do it in advance; they have to suffer a loss before they understand. --- Clarifying the architecture issues is not easy, most small coins don't have the budget for that. --- Wait, how should we implement permission isolation to ensure safety? Looking for expert guidance. --- The four words "mend the pen after sheep are lost" hit me hard. Is it still possible to switch wallets now? --- The earlier, the better. I've heard this so many times, but the execution is poor. --- The key question is how many people actually manage their own wallets? Most still keep their coins on exchanges.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist