This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 22h ago
The lesson from 200,000 is really heartbreaking
The feeling of going back to the liberation front overnight... If I didn't have that kind of determination, I would have gone bankrupt long ago
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 12-27 13:43
The 200,000 liquidation event, to put it simply, was a lack of understanding of risk management—purely reckless trading.
Data shows that those who truly survive are the ones who can resist the urge to act, and high win rates are essentially an illusion.
The key still lies in that set of logic—light initial positions, strict stop-losses, adding to positions only when floating profits appear. It's boring as hell but it works.
From 50,000 to eight figures, honestly, these numbers need validation, but the trading discipline part of the logic is indeed solid.
After research and analysis, most failures are due to two pitfalls: one is heavy position betting, and the other is stubbornly holding onto losing positions.
This article essentially explains the trading mindset clearly—no fancy tricks, but ruthless.
Don't be greedy, really. Historical data shows that those who are greedy all ended up dead.
Set stop-losses at key levels; once broken, run. This red line must not be touched—if you touch it, you're done.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 12-26 15:50
That part about the 200,000 foreign debt was really intense... but this set of stop-loss discipline is indeed ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 12-26 15:43
honestly the whole "discipline over cleverness" narrative hits different when you've actually been liquidated... but here's the thing, arguably the real issue is sub-optimal incentive structures in retail trading that make this kind of emotional journey almost inevitable. path dependency matters way more than people admit.
Reply0
QuorumVoter
· 12-26 15:36
Survived three liquidations and made it back, awesome.
经历过3次爆仓那种滋味,我这辈子都忘不了。
最惨的时候欠了20万外债,眼睁睁看着账户数字每天缩水,多少次想砸了电脑去打工,但那股不认输的劲儿,硬是没让我倒下。
直到账户只剩5万,我才真正清醒:之前学的那些花哨指标和复杂公式,全是歪路。我把它们全扔了,转向最朴素的方法——交易最核心的事儿就是"小亏大赚"。
现在我早不迷恋高胜率。十个单子赚八个小头小脑,不如等一个能赚大钱的机会。一次重仓套牢足以吞掉所有利润。我只看最基础的技术面辨别方向,真正的多头行情才敢下手,逆风单一律不碰,那就是自杀。
开仓讲究卡位置——底部区域或趋势刚起动的节点。这些地方止损设置就不用太宽松,即便看错了亏点小钱也能扛,伤不了元气。仓位我控制得死死的:底仓永远轻,风险必须排在第一位。得能承受历史级别的连亏,还得留足缓冲空间,绝不把自己逼到绝境。
止损是生死线。关键价位一破,再不甘心也必须走人,后来反弹也不后悔。死都不能扛单、亏损加仓这种低级错误。只有浮盈才慢慢建仓——要么回调不跌,要么突破前高才加一点,同时把止损往上挪,确保底仓利润先落袋。
止盈从不急。等明显的顶部信号再出手。浮盈回吐一点不在乎,哪有人能精准卖在最高点?偶尔碰到V型反转也认了,不属于你的收益强求不来。
这套系统很无聊,没任何花哨之处。但就是这份"不瞎折腾"的坚持,让我从5万本金做到了八位数。真正在这个市场活下来的人,靠的都是硬纪律。方法有多简单不重要,关键是守住规则不乱改,就能稳稳赚钱。