#比特币与黄金战争 The basic information of new tokens launched on a certain leading exchange really needs to be standardized. Core metrics like circulating supply are not even marked, how can users make judgments?
Take $LIT as an example — market cap of 23.3 billion, ranked 8739. The data looks a bit off; there might be potential to enter the top 20, but on-chain contract data must match. Can someone help dig deeper into LIT’s on-chain situation? Details like circulating supply, burn mechanisms, and large holder distribution are all of interest.
This is actually why it’s important to pay attention to the complete information system of a token. It’s not just about rankings and market cap; you also need to look at supply mechanisms, community activity, and technical aspects. To truly understand a project, you need to assemble all these puzzle pieces.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BoredWatcher
· 8h ago
Ranked 8739 with a market cap of 23.3 billion? That data is a bit exaggerated and unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 8h ago
The data doesn't match, this is really unbelievable. Is the exchange this perfunctory?
View OriginalReply0
staking_gramps
· 8h ago
The exchange's data black box is really incredible; you can't even see the full circulation volume, how can you play?
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 8h ago
Exchanges are being lazy; they don't clearly specify the circulating supply. Isn't this misleading?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 8h ago
Exchanges really need to improve the basic data; otherwise, beginners will get scammed and be completely confused.
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzler
· 8h ago
This ranking doesn't match the market cap, the exchange data is really a bit outrageous.
#比特币与黄金战争 The basic information of new tokens launched on a certain leading exchange really needs to be standardized. Core metrics like circulating supply are not even marked, how can users make judgments?
Take $LIT as an example — market cap of 23.3 billion, ranked 8739. The data looks a bit off; there might be potential to enter the top 20, but on-chain contract data must match. Can someone help dig deeper into LIT’s on-chain situation? Details like circulating supply, burn mechanisms, and large holder distribution are all of interest.
This is actually why it’s important to pay attention to the complete information system of a token. It’s not just about rankings and market cap; you also need to look at supply mechanisms, community activity, and technical aspects. To truly understand a project, you need to assemble all these puzzle pieces.