Based on the activity level of on-chain addresses, this project may have some form of cooperation with the official team. The interaction frequency and attitude between both parties seem positive. If the official has a support plan, they might prioritize such ecosystem participants. These signals are still worth paying attention to in early-stage projects, as much can be gleaned from interaction records.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 6h ago
Reading on-chain data is indeed a bit particular; it depends on the details.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 6h ago
There are indeed tricks to on-chain data, but don't put too much trust in interaction frequency... I've seen too many fake collaborations.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 6h ago
On-chain data can indeed reveal insights, but when genuine support will be implemented remains uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 7h ago
Frequent on-chain interactions just to get support? Wake up, I've seen this trick many times before.
Based on the activity level of on-chain addresses, this project may have some form of cooperation with the official team. The interaction frequency and attitude between both parties seem positive. If the official has a support plan, they might prioritize such ecosystem participants. These signals are still worth paying attention to in early-stage projects, as much can be gleaned from interaction records.