Given the overwhelming demand, we've had to make a tough call—Patron holders won't receive guaranteed allocations under the original plan. The culprit? A significantly lower FDV means less tokens available for distribution. Fewer tokens in the pool equals fewer guarantees we can actually honor. It's one of those situations where success breeds its own problems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MindsetExpander
· 2025-12-28 03:50
Wow, this is a classic move of "we succeeded, so you have to suffer the loss."
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 2025-12-27 04:41
Now it's really awkward; success has become a problem...
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 2025-12-26 03:20
ngl this is awkward... Successfully cutting the patron's guarantee limit? Feels a bit like being between a rock and a hard place.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 2025-12-25 13:52
Hmm... Is the price of success cutting off the allocations for the old supporters? That logic is a bit absurd.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 2025-12-25 13:41
Whoa, such a low FDV? Does that mean my allocation is gone?
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGod
· 2025-12-25 13:31
Wow, such a low FDV? How much of my allocation is still remaining?
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMiner
· 2025-12-25 13:23
Oh no, this is a crash. Turns out low FDV is also a trap.
Given the overwhelming demand, we've had to make a tough call—Patron holders won't receive guaranteed allocations under the original plan. The culprit? A significantly lower FDV means less tokens available for distribution. Fewer tokens in the pool equals fewer guarantees we can actually honor. It's one of those situations where success breeds its own problems.