In recent years, Crypto Assets have been widely used but seldom discussed in Africa. The real demand has long existed, but regulatory oversight has been lacking, causing the industry to remain in a gray area. Ghana's choice this time is essentially an acknowledgment of reality.
The Ghanaian Parliament has officially passed the "Virtual Asset Service Provider Bill", marking a key turning point where Crypto Assets are no longer considered an unregulated underground activity, but are explicitly incorporated into the country's financial system as a legitimate business.
Whether individuals or institutions are engaged in businesses related to digital assets, they need to register with the central bank or the Securities and Exchange Commission according to the nature of their business. This is not a simple relaxation, but a systematic acceptance with boundaries and responsibilities.
It is noteworthy that Johnson Asiama, the governor of the Bank of Ghana, has stated that after the bill is passed, no one will be arrested for trading Crypto Assets. The significance of this statement goes far beyond the text of the law itself; it reflects a shift in policy attitude from risk prevention to recognition and guidance under regulation.
This step is not a decision made on a whim. According to estimates by Web3 Africa Group, Ghana processed approximately $3 billion in Crypto Assets transactions in just one year from July 2023 to June 2024. The demand has long been evident; the question is whether to continue allowing funds to flow in a regulatory blind spot or to bring them into a system that is monitorable and governable. Ghana has chosen the latter.
Longer-term signals come from the planning for 2026. Ghana plans to focus on digital asset exploration around payments, trade financing, and market infrastructure, which includes researching asset-backed digital settlement tools such as gold-collateralized stablecoins. This is crucial as it indicates that regulators are no longer satisfied with merely allowing transactions, but are thinking about how to combine the country's advantageous assets with blockchain financial infrastructure to serve the real economy.
From a global perspective, Ghana's approach is not radical, but very pragmatic. It has not rushed to launch a national-level crypto narrative, nor has it indiscriminately blocked innovation; instead, it has chosen to first establish rights, then regulate, and finally apply. This is precisely the kind of pace that many emerging markets need.
If the crypto regulation in Europe and the United States is more about managing risks, then countries like Ghana seem to be answering another question: Can digital assets become part of the infrastructure when traditional finance cannot fully cover it?
This legislation may not immediately change the global Crypto Assets landscape, but it clearly indicates one thing: in the face of real demand and capital flow, more and more countries are choosing to confront it head-on rather than continue to evade it. For the entire industry, being taken seriously is in itself a progress.
#加纳 #Crypto Assets #encryption regulation
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
In recent years, Crypto Assets have been widely used but seldom discussed in Africa. The real demand has long existed, but regulatory oversight has been lacking, causing the industry to remain in a gray area. Ghana's choice this time is essentially an acknowledgment of reality.
The Ghanaian Parliament has officially passed the "Virtual Asset Service Provider Bill", marking a key turning point where Crypto Assets are no longer considered an unregulated underground activity, but are explicitly incorporated into the country's financial system as a legitimate business.
Whether individuals or institutions are engaged in businesses related to digital assets, they need to register with the central bank or the Securities and Exchange Commission according to the nature of their business. This is not a simple relaxation, but a systematic acceptance with boundaries and responsibilities.
It is noteworthy that Johnson Asiama, the governor of the Bank of Ghana, has stated that after the bill is passed, no one will be arrested for trading Crypto Assets. The significance of this statement goes far beyond the text of the law itself; it reflects a shift in policy attitude from risk prevention to recognition and guidance under regulation.
This step is not a decision made on a whim. According to estimates by Web3 Africa Group, Ghana processed approximately $3 billion in Crypto Assets transactions in just one year from July 2023 to June 2024. The demand has long been evident; the question is whether to continue allowing funds to flow in a regulatory blind spot or to bring them into a system that is monitorable and governable. Ghana has chosen the latter.
Longer-term signals come from the planning for 2026. Ghana plans to focus on digital asset exploration around payments, trade financing, and market infrastructure, which includes researching asset-backed digital settlement tools such as gold-collateralized stablecoins. This is crucial as it indicates that regulators are no longer satisfied with merely allowing transactions, but are thinking about how to combine the country's advantageous assets with blockchain financial infrastructure to serve the real economy.
From a global perspective, Ghana's approach is not radical, but very pragmatic. It has not rushed to launch a national-level crypto narrative, nor has it indiscriminately blocked innovation; instead, it has chosen to first establish rights, then regulate, and finally apply. This is precisely the kind of pace that many emerging markets need.
If the crypto regulation in Europe and the United States is more about managing risks, then countries like Ghana seem to be answering another question: Can digital assets become part of the infrastructure when traditional finance cannot fully cover it?
This legislation may not immediately change the global Crypto Assets landscape, but it clearly indicates one thing: in the face of real demand and capital flow, more and more countries are choosing to confront it head-on rather than continue to evade it. For the entire industry, being taken seriously is in itself a progress.
#加纳 #Crypto Assets #encryption regulation