Everyone talks about the world transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable electricity—it's become the trendy narrative. But here's the catch: when we zoom into the actual numbers, things get way messier. The real question isn't whether we're moving towards electrons (the slogan sounds great), but HOW those electrons are actually being generated. In absolute terms, not just as a percentage of the mix, we need to ask: are we producing more clean energy overall, or just shuffling the same dirty infrastructure around? This matters big time for anyone thinking about crypto's energy footprint, data centers, or any energy-intensive tech. The gap between what people *say* about energy transition and what's actually happening on the grid tells a completely different story.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapy
· 7h ago
Nah, all these numbers are just scams. The green energy rhetoric is just to be heard and then forgotten.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxiety
· 7h ago
Basically, it's a numbers game. Do you prefer looking at percentages?
---
Tired of the usual rhetoric about energy transition. The key point is that the absolute values are still there.
---
I agree. I just want to know whether the absolute output of clean energy has actually increased. Don’t tell me about proportions.
---
Crypto has been hacked for so long, and yet the grid still isn’t clean... Irony.
---
That’s why I don’t trust any energy data; it’s all selective statistics.
---
It’s really the energy version of "survivor bias." Those who talk about percentages are just fooling themselves.
---
Honestly, this logic also applies to carbon offset; they’re just on paper standards.
---
The most frustrating part is that some projects still use "green" labels to deceive retail investors. Just look at the grid to understand.
---
No one really cares about absolute values anymore; everyone is just hyping concepts...
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 7h ago
Numbers lie, and percentages lie even more. The green energy transition sounds great, but in reality, it might just be a case of putting lipstick on a pig.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 8h ago
The green energy narrative is all a scam. I bet five dollars that most people haven't even looked at the power grid data.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 8h ago
Basically, it's just data deception. A percentage increase doesn't mean the absolute amount is truly growing. The crypto space needs to be more cautious of this trick.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 8h ago
Solved it, the green energy transition is just a digital game, the percentages look good and the guilt is gone.
Everyone talks about the world transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable electricity—it's become the trendy narrative. But here's the catch: when we zoom into the actual numbers, things get way messier. The real question isn't whether we're moving towards electrons (the slogan sounds great), but HOW those electrons are actually being generated. In absolute terms, not just as a percentage of the mix, we need to ask: are we producing more clean energy overall, or just shuffling the same dirty infrastructure around? This matters big time for anyone thinking about crypto's energy footprint, data centers, or any energy-intensive tech. The gap between what people *say* about energy transition and what's actually happening on the grid tells a completely different story.