Last week, a friend who had only been in the crypto market for 3 months was so angry that he wanted to delete the app immediately. After a few weeks of rolling around with the charts, he finally earned 10,000 USDT – not too much money for a long-time player, but for a newcomer it is a proud achievement. He decided to withdraw to his personal wallet for peace of mind… And then the nightmare began.
As soon as the request was sent, the system immediately popped up “checking”. Before waiting long, the support staff sent a message urgently:
“Please indicate the purpose of withdrawal?” Where does the funding come from?" Is it possible to provide trading partner information?"
The friend replied softly: “This is personal property, information is private.”
Result? The account is labeled “high risk” and the withdrawal feature is locked!
For me – someone who has been following the market for more than 5 years – such stories are appearing more and more in the community. Many people shared that: just withdraw more than 5,000 USDT to write a “description of the use of money”, write “personal spending”, and it will be rejected because… “not enough reason”. Some exchanges even require the last 3 months of transfer history.
After all, is this prevention of money laundering or making users the “default suspect”?
To put it bluntly: ‘Legalizing’ does not mean ‘doubting the user’
In every financial industry, fraud prevention is necessary. But the problem lies in how to do it.
Crypto was born with the spirit: users take control of their own assets.
No one accepts that their own assets are frozen just because they don’t want to declare more than the limit.
A reasonable moderation process should be based on:
identity verification, anomalous behavior analysis, only request additional information when a clear risk is actually detected.
But now many exchanges do the opposite: impose strict checks on all users – even if they are completely legal. This is not only frustrating but also causes the community to lose faith in trading platforms.
Trust is difficult to build, but it is very easy to collapse just because of a single “withdrawal is like borrowing from a bank”.
3 Steps to Avoid Withdrawal Hassle – Newbies Must Know
Double-check the withdrawal rules before trading
When registering an account, do not ignore the “Withdrawal Policy” section.
Let’s take a good look:
Withdrawal limit per day, When is censorship triggered, What kind of information should be provided.
Priority is given to choosing brokers with:
✔ Clear operating licenses,
✔ Transparent moderation process,
✔ Customer support is fast and responsible.
This reduces up to 70% of the risk of unreasonable withdrawal lockouts.
Protect your privacy and don’t compromise unconditionally
Cooperating with exchanges within the scope of statutory regulations such as KYC, identity verification, is normal.
But if the exchange requires:
“Purpose of withdrawal”, “Who is the recipient”, “Provision of transaction history”,
then you have the right to refuse.
If you are threatened with “do not provide, do not withdraw”, shall:
Take a photo of the evidence, contact the management agency, and send an application to the supervisory organization of the exchange.
Privacy is a boundary that should not be compromised.
Never leave the entire property on one floor
Here’s the principle of survival in crypto: “Don’t keep assets where you don’t control your private keys.”
Let’s divide the assets into:
Self-managed wallets (cold wallet) → long-term funds, as much as possible. The exchange account → only for the amount to be traded in the short term.
This not only avoids the hassle of withdrawing funds, but also minimizes the risk of the exchange crashing, freezing, or going bankrupt.
Crypto wants to grow – the platform must respect users
No one is opposed to legal compliance, but legality should not be turned into a tool of difficulty.
The floor should focus on:
Upgrade risk analysis technology, use AI models to detect abnormal behavior more accurately, instead of applying a series of “suspicious” questions to every customer.
Only when transparency and respect are put at the forefront will the market be strong enough to attract long-term investors.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Withdraw 10,000 USDT and be asked like "go to declare household registration"? The Worrying Truth Behind the Censorship
Last week, a friend who had only been in the crypto market for 3 months was so angry that he wanted to delete the app immediately. After a few weeks of rolling around with the charts, he finally earned 10,000 USDT – not too much money for a long-time player, but for a newcomer it is a proud achievement. He decided to withdraw to his personal wallet for peace of mind… And then the nightmare began. As soon as the request was sent, the system immediately popped up “checking”. Before waiting long, the support staff sent a message urgently: “Please indicate the purpose of withdrawal?” Where does the funding come from?" Is it possible to provide trading partner information?" The friend replied softly: “This is personal property, information is private.” Result? The account is labeled “high risk” and the withdrawal feature is locked! For me – someone who has been following the market for more than 5 years – such stories are appearing more and more in the community. Many people shared that: just withdraw more than 5,000 USDT to write a “description of the use of money”, write “personal spending”, and it will be rejected because… “not enough reason”. Some exchanges even require the last 3 months of transfer history. After all, is this prevention of money laundering or making users the “default suspect”? To put it bluntly: ‘Legalizing’ does not mean ‘doubting the user’ In every financial industry, fraud prevention is necessary. But the problem lies in how to do it. Crypto was born with the spirit: users take control of their own assets. No one accepts that their own assets are frozen just because they don’t want to declare more than the limit. A reasonable moderation process should be based on: identity verification, anomalous behavior analysis, only request additional information when a clear risk is actually detected. But now many exchanges do the opposite: impose strict checks on all users – even if they are completely legal. This is not only frustrating but also causes the community to lose faith in trading platforms. Trust is difficult to build, but it is very easy to collapse just because of a single “withdrawal is like borrowing from a bank”. 3 Steps to Avoid Withdrawal Hassle – Newbies Must Know