#比特币对比代币化黄金 A well-known whale has bucked the trend in Ethereum’s downward channel, increasing their position and pushing a 25x leveraged long to a size of $37.36 million. The timing of this move is intriguing—while the market is generally bearish, this whale is putting real money on the line to make a statement.



Position data shows that the unrealized profit on this massive position has fallen from its peak to $860,000. Each 1% price swing results in a six-figure gain or loss. With 25x leverage, a mere 4% adverse move is enough to trigger forced liquidation. This is not a level of risk that ordinary players can stomach.

In terms of capital size, a contract position of over $37 million is already capable of influencing short-term price action. Especially during periods of relatively low liquidity, such a one-sided position can itself serve as one of the price anchors.

The rationale behind averaging up against the trend is worth pondering. Either the whale has picked up on some technical or on-chain support signal, or is betting on an oversold rebound. Players who can keep building positions during a downturn often have access to information retail traders can’t see.

Current market sentiment is indeed fractured. Traditional financial institutions like JPMorgan have recently downgraded crypto assets, but tech giants like Meta are pushing forward with Web3 infrastructure. The tug-of-war between bulls and bears has made the short-term outlook murky.

From a capital flow perspective, while a few whales are active, there’s no clear sign of significant inflows from traditional institutions. The market remains a zero-sum game among existing players, lacking new capital injection.

It’s important to stress that 25x leverage is not standard practice. This level of risk means even small price moves can have fatal consequences. The whale’s capital depth and risk control systems are beyond the reach of ordinary traders.

Technically, the whale’s chosen entry point may be near a key support—such as a dense options strike price or a historical high-volume trading zone. Whether the market agrees with this judgment remains to be seen.

If Ethereum stabilizes at this key level, the move will be seen as a perfectly timed bottom buy; if it continues downward, this huge position could instead become a target for bears. The market is providing the answer.

$BTC
BTC-0.39%
ETH-1.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
0xSherlockvip
· 3h ago
I don't get what this guy is thinking. He's so good at playing with 25x leverage, but insists on adding to his position at the worst point in the market. Is there some info we're missing? A whale dumps over 37 million to try and set the tone, but I don't see any institutional funds making moves either. How can he hold up the market by himself? If he can really withstand a 4% swing without getting liquidated, he must have some serious backing. Us retail investors can only watch from the sidelines.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 14h ago
According to research, this level of leveraged trading is essentially a game of asymmetric information. Retail investors see floating losses, while whales see on-chain data and the interactive logic of option concentration zones—these two perspectives are not even on the same scale. It’s worth noting that with 25x leverage, a 4% fluctuation can be fatal, which shows just how confident he is in the support level. But what concerns me more is the conflicting signals between JPMorgan downgrading its rating and Meta promoting Web3. Which one better represents the future direction of capital flow? The outcome of a zero-sum game is often brutal.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidatorvip
· 12-05 11:41
Fucking gambler, playing like this with 25x leverage—one 4% move and it’s all gone. I’m nervous just watching him. Is this whale bottom-fishing or just gambling? I really can’t tell anymore. Throwing down 37 million—either he becomes a legend or a laughingstock, there’s no middle ground. I just want to know what information he has that we don’t. Feels like he’s playing with cheat codes. Meta is getting into Web3, JPM is bearish—this market is truly split. No wonder the price action is so weird. As long as he doesn’t get liquidated, he wins. But with this leverage, it’s a close call. Ordinary people can’t replicate this kind of move—the capital and mental tolerance required are worlds apart. Let’s wait and see what happens next. If the price stabilizes, it’s a genius play; if it keeps dropping, get ready for a big liquidation show.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuyvip
· 12-05 11:41
Playing this big with 25x leverage, are they tired of living or do they have information advantages hitting the ceiling? --- Whales can hold on, but us retail investors shouldn’t even think about it. A 4% move and it’s game over. --- If this move really catches the bottom, it’s genius. If it keeps dropping, you’re just prey for the liquidation machine. --- JPMorgan is bearish on Meta building Web3. Both sides are betting—we’re just here for the show. --- A $37 million position—every single tick is six figures. Just thinking about it is scary. --- Feels like the whales have access to data we can’t see. Otherwise, who would dare to play like this? --- Such a critical support level—next step is to see if it holds. If not, it’ll be a liquidation bloodbath.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHuntervip
· 12-05 11:38
25x leverage... this guy really dares to play, at a pace where just a 4% move would liquidate him. I'm about to lose my pants. The whales are buying the dip, while us retail investors are still debating whether to stop loss, haha. There really is an information gap, but who dares to bet 37 million? The risk tolerance just isn't on the same level. Judging by his moves, they've already identified the bottom signal. Let's wait and see. But seriously... if he loses on this one, even a 1% move would mean losing six figures. Just thinking about it gives me cold sweats.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMastervip
· 12-05 11:37
Really daring, betting directly on the nation's fate with 25x leverage—an ordinary person would be wiped out with just a touch. This guy either really has access to data we can't see, or he just has a pure gambler's mentality. A 4% move and it's liquidated—way too intense, haha. Waiting to see what happens next. If he succeeds, he's a master; if he fails, he'll be a cautionary tale. Whale money really is different—throwing $37 million around like it's nothing.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Groupvip
· 12-05 11:34
Damn, 25x leverage is bold. Looks like we’re just here to watch the show this time. --- Whales throwing in so much money, what does that mean... Either they know something, or it's just a gambler's mentality. --- Liquidated at just 4%? Just thinking about it makes me break out in a cold sweat—this kind of pressure is really unbearable. --- This is how market sentiment gets torn apart—JPMorgan is bearish, Meta is building Web3, who the hell is telling the truth? --- Honestly, it’s still just an information gap. The whales already know what retail investors can’t see. We’re just spectators. --- Let’s just wait and see. Either this guy becomes a legend or gets rekt—it's just how the casino works. --- A $37 million order can move the market? Liquidity is really that bad. --- If it stabilizes at this key level, that's bottom picking. If it keeps dropping, it's a hunt. Nothing's actually settled yet. --- It’s not exactly scary, but it really feels like there’s a bit of gambling going on this time. --- Even with Ethereum like this, whales still go all in? Either they're crazy, or they have inside info.
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWalletvip
· 12-05 11:23
Damn, using 25x leverage and still playing like this—does this guy really have that much money or does he have a death wish? Whales really have access to things we can't see. I can't afford to play games where a 4% move liquidates you. JPMorgan is bearish, Meta keeps building—this market is seriously torn apart. I believe a $37 million position can move the market; now it's just a matter of whether he can catch the bottom this time. With no new money coming in, it's just a zero-sum game with existing funds. Are retail investors just waiting to get rekt?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)