The hype around the Ethereum upgrade has basically come to an end. This month, there are only two things left in the market worth speculating on: whether the Fed will cut interest rates, and who the new chair will be.



Recently, Trump has been frequently endorsing Hassett, sending a pretty clear signal. On prediction platforms, Hassett's odds of winning have soared to 90%, so it’s pretty much a done deal. If he really takes over in the end, this guy could become the most crypto-friendly Fed chair in U.S. history—at least on the surface.

But then again, being friendly is one thing; the real issue is whether he’s willing to cut rates quickly according to Trump’s wishes. I think this question will directly determine how long this current round of small-scale corrections will drag on.

Now, about that recent big move. The Fed suddenly injected $13.5 billion into the banking system, the second largest amount since the pandemic, and even bigger than any rescue during the dot-com bubble burst.

Some people are wondering if this means quantitative easing is on the way. I don’t think so. Normally, when the Fed starts pumping liquidity, risk assets should take a hit first, but the U.S. stock market barely reacted. This injection looks more like topping up a pool that's about to dry up—the stock market is soaring, retail investors are leveraging like crazy, and the leverage scale has hit a record high of $1.13 trillion, rising like a rocket.

In reality, the funds inside the market are almost drained. Rather than an active liquidity injection, the Fed’s move is more of a passive rescue. The data is clear: U.S. banks aren’t having an easy time, and this was essentially an emergency transfusion, indirectly reflecting a weakening economy.

So the conclusion is simple: short-term, it’s positive; long-term, it’s questionable. When the market is short on cash, relying on this bit of liquidity to kick off a new bull cycle is just not realistic. Right now, the entire market is hanging on to this month’s expectation of a Fed rate cut. Where things go from here all depends on how the policy cards are played.
ETH-4.1%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugeevip
· 21h ago
Hassett coming to power might actually be positive news, but rate cuts are the real key. Retail investors have leveraged up to 1.13 trillion, this pool is really hollow. The Fed is bailing out the market, the economy might really be in trouble. Waiting to see the policy cards, there are only these two cards this month. Rate cut expectations are holding things up, but it's too risky in the long term. Is Hassett crypto-friendly? It's just for show; let's see if he dares to cut rates. 13.5 billion can't cover this gap.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 12-04 10:56
Is Hassett coming to power crypto-friendly? Sounds nice, but the key is still to cut interest rates. Wait, $13.5 billion in injection? Doesn't that mean the economy is barely holding on? $1.13 trillion in leverage... Retail investors are really daring, but sooner or later the bill will come due. The Fed's moves this time are more like firefighting than money printing—looks risky. This month the market is hanging on just because of rate cut expectations, the risk is pretty high, everyone. Trump is backing Hassett, but being crypto-friendly ≠ being friendly to our wallets. Funds are almost dried up, and you want to rely on this little liquidity to support a new bull market? Keep dreaming. Short-term bullish, long-term questionable—this assessment is still reliable.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 12-04 10:50
That 13.5 billion capital injection was essentially to patch holes—the banking system is already bleeding.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStakervip
· 12-04 10:49
nah, this leverage balloon at $1.13T is absolutely unhinged... one policy hiccup and we're watching cascading liquidations, not a fed pivot. the "emergency transfusion" framing is spot-on tbh.
Reply0
HashRatePhilosophervip
· 12-04 10:34
I’m optimistic about Hassett coming to power. As long as he’s crypto-friendly, that’s enough for now—other things can wait. Everyone’s going all in based on rate cut expectations, but what happens when the time actually comes? $13.5 billion is for bailing out, not quantitative easing—I agree with that. Liquidity is definitely tight now. Leverage has piled up to $1.13 trillion, who dares to take that on? The market can’t handle it. The Fed’s recent actions are just a sign of lacking confidence, to be honest. The economic data is right there—they can’t escape it. Rate cuts are what really matter. Until they actually happen, everything else is just wishful thinking.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 12-04 10:32
$13.5 billion poured in—frankly, it's just watering a garden that's about to wither... This time it's not proactive liquidity injection, it's a forced bailout. Obvious at a glance.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)