#美联储重启降息步伐 Traditional finance has dealt another heavy blow to the crypto space.
The latest news shows that MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) plans to kick out companies with more than 50% of their holdings in cryptocurrencies from its index system. This is no joke—MSCI’s indices are a barometer for trillions of dollars globally, guiding money flows from ETFs to mutual funds.
Simply put: if your company holds a huge amount of BTC or ETH on its books, sorry, but you’re no longer considered a “legitimate business” in their eyes. As far as MSCI is concerned, these companies have become “crypto funds in public company clothing,” not operating entities creating value through real business. The standard is clear—indices should track real economic activity, not speculative instruments.
How big is the impact? JPMorgan’s analysts did the math: MicroStrategy alone could face $2.8 billion in passive selling pressure. The company’s passive holdings are about $9 billion, accounting for 16% of its $56 billion market cap. Industry-wide? There’s a potential $11.6 billion in capital outflows.
What’s worse is the chain reaction. If MSCI acts, will indices like the Nasdaq 100 follow suit? The selling pressure could be on a whole new level.
This actually exposes traditional finance’s true attitude toward crypto assets—isolation. In the eyes of mainstream capital, cryptocurrencies are still classified as high-risk speculative instruments, not asset classes to be treated equally. So where are the boundaries of “institutional adoption?” This time, we have a clear answer.
Thinking of buying the dip? It’s better to look at high-quality assets with solid fundamentals. $BTC $ETH $BNB
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketNoodler
· 12h ago
MSCI's move is indeed ruthless, but to be honest, isn't this just exposing the emperor's new clothes? It was only a matter of time.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholar
· 12h ago
Huh? MSCI is really going all in, throwing out 11.6 billion just like that—this kind of volatility must hurt.
Traditional finance just can't stand seeing us do well, they always have to stir things up. But to be fair, MicroStrategy's moves were indeed a bit too aggressive.
Wait, does this mean ETFs might follow suit? If they really do, that would be truly scary.
But on the other hand, isn’t this actually a signal—it shows the ecosystem is really maturing, and traditional capital is starting to take crypto seriously. If they want to separate, let them; we can do just fine on our own.
Is this a strong bottom signal or not? What do you all think?
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 12h ago
Ha, here we go again. Traditional finance is still using the same old tricks to squeeze us out.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 12h ago
Damn, here we go again. Those traditional finance people just can't stand seeing us make money.
#美联储重启降息步伐 Traditional finance has dealt another heavy blow to the crypto space.
The latest news shows that MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) plans to kick out companies with more than 50% of their holdings in cryptocurrencies from its index system. This is no joke—MSCI’s indices are a barometer for trillions of dollars globally, guiding money flows from ETFs to mutual funds.
Simply put: if your company holds a huge amount of BTC or ETH on its books, sorry, but you’re no longer considered a “legitimate business” in their eyes. As far as MSCI is concerned, these companies have become “crypto funds in public company clothing,” not operating entities creating value through real business. The standard is clear—indices should track real economic activity, not speculative instruments.
How big is the impact? JPMorgan’s analysts did the math: MicroStrategy alone could face $2.8 billion in passive selling pressure. The company’s passive holdings are about $9 billion, accounting for 16% of its $56 billion market cap. Industry-wide? There’s a potential $11.6 billion in capital outflows.
What’s worse is the chain reaction. If MSCI acts, will indices like the Nasdaq 100 follow suit? The selling pressure could be on a whole new level.
This actually exposes traditional finance’s true attitude toward crypto assets—isolation. In the eyes of mainstream capital, cryptocurrencies are still classified as high-risk speculative instruments, not asset classes to be treated equally. So where are the boundaries of “institutional adoption?” This time, we have a clear answer.
Thinking of buying the dip? It’s better to look at high-quality assets with solid fundamentals. $BTC $ETH $BNB