The options for trading in a Bear Market are actually quite limited. Coins like MON that fall below the issue price are worth following—let me highlight a few points: firstly, this is a public chain project from the IDO of a certain large Compliance platform, with chips highly concentrated in the hands of the market maker. The cost price is around 0.025, and after falling below this level, the rebound strength is usually not too weak. Just look at how it violently pumped from the low point to 0.033 recently.
What's more interesting is that after checking a few leading exchanges, I found that they haven't launched spot trading yet. This liquidity gap can sometimes be an opportunity window. Of course, high market maker control is a double-edged sword, but in a Bear Market environment where the underlying assets are scarce, varieties with clear cost support and potential coin issuance expectations can indeed be placed into the observation pool.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 12h ago
Players of coins that fall below the issue price really have some skills, but isn't this MON too small?
---
The liquidity gap sounds nice, but I'm afraid that the one catching a falling knife is myself.
---
0.025 support? It's up to the market maker, don't think too much.
---
Picking up bargains in a Bear Market is just betting on the market maker's conscience, uh, this bet is a bit big.
---
Top exchanges haven't listed it yet, isn't this just BTC not arriving?
---
The chips are concentrated in the hands of the market maker, what we're playing is just a psychological game.
---
There are too many coins lying in the observation pool, why must it be this one?
---
Getting excited about pulling it from 0.025 to 0.033? Is this amplitude worth the risk?
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 12h ago
In a Bear Market, it depends on who can catch the rhythm correctly when buying the dip. This MON situation is indeed interesting; the concentration of market maker chips is rather a stable guarantee.
Wait, is the liquidity gap an opportunity? This logic seems a bit off to me...
Is the probability of coins that fall below the issue price doubling really that high, or is it just another round of arbitrage games?
A support at a cost price of 0.025 sounds good, but who can guarantee that the market maker won't run away?
The key is to look at the expectations of this coin on mainstream exchanges; without this, it's just gambling.
If you play too much with this high market control, in the end, the ones who get Rekt are still the retail investors.
It's okay to observe the pool, but don't go all in, brothers. Remember that.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrain
· 12h ago
Market makers concentrating chips is... a signal to play people for suckers.
Before controlling the market trend, they first inflate a bubble until liquidity arrives and then directly crash.
Such "opportunities" are the most dangerous in a bear market; your account could be wiped out after lying around for a year.
Excited about a rebound of 0.033? Have you ever seen a real rug?
Cost support? Dude, this is a coin that has fallen below the issue price; what support is there?
The expectation of issuing coins or solid proof of issuing coins; don't let it be another empty promise.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12h ago
The story of coins falling below the issue price making a comeback always follows this pattern, doesn't it? The market maker concentrating their chips has instead become an advantage?
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 12h ago
Can a coin that falls below the issue price really be that impressive? The concentration of market maker chips is just the prelude to playing people for suckers.
The options for trading in a Bear Market are actually quite limited. Coins like MON that fall below the issue price are worth following—let me highlight a few points: firstly, this is a public chain project from the IDO of a certain large Compliance platform, with chips highly concentrated in the hands of the market maker. The cost price is around 0.025, and after falling below this level, the rebound strength is usually not too weak. Just look at how it violently pumped from the low point to 0.033 recently.
What's more interesting is that after checking a few leading exchanges, I found that they haven't launched spot trading yet. This liquidity gap can sometimes be an opportunity window. Of course, high market maker control is a double-edged sword, but in a Bear Market environment where the underlying assets are scarce, varieties with clear cost support and potential coin issuance expectations can indeed be placed into the observation pool.