Recently, the regulators have taken action against stablecoins. Anyone with a discerning eye can understand that this is an attempt to cut off certain funding channels at the source. However, this "whack-a-mole" approach seems quite labor-intensive. Checking bank accounts, blocking payment tools, one after another. The problem is, market demand is like flowing water; if you block one end, it will naturally emerge from the other.
What's more interesting is that I heard they are brewing a "sovereign stablecoin". The idea might be good, but the logic seems a bit off. In the crypto space, it's never the case that whoever speaks has the final say - it's based on consensus. Value isn't created by policy documents; it needs to be supported by real application scenarios. Look at why people are willing to use the projects in Southeast Asia? It's not because it's being forced; it's because cross-border remittance is truly fast and cheap. Pushing it hard without a grassroots foundation could backfire, pushing funds and technical talent towards more open markets. If this happens, it might give the existing crypto market a reverse boost, and could the bull market start earlier? It's hard to say.
Looking at traditional banks again. These institutions are indeed a bit flustered now, but I think they might be targeting the wrong competitors. It's not new for users to complain about banks—cumbersome processes, high fees, and slow transaction times have become the norm. Now, what about DeFi and the Ethereum ecosystem? Cross-border transfers can be completed in about ten minutes, costing just a few bucks, and the opportunities for returns are even more diverse. It's not that anyone is deliberately targeting banks; it's that money has grown legs and is running towards more efficient and freer places. This is the trend, and there's no stopping it.
When it comes to the future, my personal feeling is becoming increasingly clear: the trigger point for the next big market movement is likely not in the technology itself, but in the subtle shift of regulatory attitudes. When the boundaries between traditional finance and decentralized finance begin to blur, that will be the moment truly worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenTherapist
· 23h ago
The whack-a-mole game is still going on, it really is exhausting to watch them struggle.
As soon as regulation presses down on one issue, another will pop up, and sooner or later we will see the market's creativity.
Sovereign stablecoin? First, let's ask the users if they are willing, as policy documents can't create Consensus.
Banks really have found the wrong enemy, DeFi has come uninvited.
Money is running to where it is efficient, and no one can stop that.
The moment the boundaries become blurred is the key, a slight shift in regulation could be the spark for the next wave of market movement.
Slow processes and high fees, DeFi has long exposed the issues with that traditional financial system.
Instead of blocking, it’s better to think about how to earn the dividends from this wave of Reverse support.
If the next bull run starts early, it could very well be a joke created by the policies themselves.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 23h ago
Playing whack-a-mole until you're bald, and still thinking you can block market demand? Too naive, buddy
---
Pushing sovereign stablecoins is useless, the crypto world relies on consensus, not government orders. The Southeast Asia region is booming because it's really cheap and fast
---
Haha, what are banks panicking about? They should reflect on their own expensive and slow methods
---
I feel like the trigger point for the next wave of market movement might really be in the regulatory attitude; once the boundaries become unclear, things change
---
Forcing it instead drives money and talent towards the crypto market; this move is quite something
---
Money has grown legs and is running towards freer places, who can stop this trend?
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 23h ago
Ha, I've been playing Whac-A-Mole for so long and still can't figure it out, pushing for sovereign coins is even funnier.
Once regulation tightens, funds will flow on-chain, isn't that just fueling the bull run?
Banks are still anxious, users have already voted with their feet, DeFi is really appealing.
When regulation and Decentralization start to find common ground, that will be the real opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 23h ago
The metaphor of打地鼠 is brilliant; regulators don’t understand how the market operates.
Pushing for sovereign stablecoins? Wake up, the crypto world relies on Consensus, not government orders.
On the DeFi side, cross-border transfers can be done in about ten minutes, while banks are still dragging their feet. It's clear who wins.
Water flowing downstream is a natural law; no matter how much you block it, you can't change that.
The real turning point will be when the regulatory attitude shifts. At that time, once traditional finance and on-chain finance merge, things will get serious.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 23h ago
Haha, the whack-a-mole style of regulation is indeed boring, it can't be stopped.
Money will really find its way out on its own, it's already been verified over in Southeast Asia.
What banks should reflect on now is not how to suppress, but why they are so disappointing.
I bet the trigger point for the next market trend will be the moment when regulation shifts.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 23h ago
The whack-a-mole style operations are indeed exhausting, but you can't say that this wave might really bring a reverse assist to the crypto world.
The more regulations tighten, the more funds run away. Why are there projects being used in Southeast Asia? It's simply because they are really fast and really cheap, and policy documents can't create consensus.
Why are banks panicking? Users have already voted with their feet. DeFi can be done in just over ten minutes with transaction fees of just a few bucks; this isn't targeted at anyone, money just has its own legs and runs to a freer place.
What I really see as promising is that subtle shift in regulatory attitude; it's worth going all in when the boundary between TradFi and the chain becomes blurred.
Recently, the regulators have taken action against stablecoins. Anyone with a discerning eye can understand that this is an attempt to cut off certain funding channels at the source. However, this "whack-a-mole" approach seems quite labor-intensive. Checking bank accounts, blocking payment tools, one after another. The problem is, market demand is like flowing water; if you block one end, it will naturally emerge from the other.
What's more interesting is that I heard they are brewing a "sovereign stablecoin". The idea might be good, but the logic seems a bit off. In the crypto space, it's never the case that whoever speaks has the final say - it's based on consensus. Value isn't created by policy documents; it needs to be supported by real application scenarios. Look at why people are willing to use the projects in Southeast Asia? It's not because it's being forced; it's because cross-border remittance is truly fast and cheap. Pushing it hard without a grassroots foundation could backfire, pushing funds and technical talent towards more open markets. If this happens, it might give the existing crypto market a reverse boost, and could the bull market start earlier? It's hard to say.
Looking at traditional banks again. These institutions are indeed a bit flustered now, but I think they might be targeting the wrong competitors. It's not new for users to complain about banks—cumbersome processes, high fees, and slow transaction times have become the norm. Now, what about DeFi and the Ethereum ecosystem? Cross-border transfers can be completed in about ten minutes, costing just a few bucks, and the opportunities for returns are even more diverse. It's not that anyone is deliberately targeting banks; it's that money has grown legs and is running towards more efficient and freer places. This is the trend, and there's no stopping it.
When it comes to the future, my personal feeling is becoming increasingly clear: the trigger point for the next big market movement is likely not in the technology itself, but in the subtle shift of regulatory attitudes. When the boundaries between traditional finance and decentralized finance begin to blur, that will be the moment truly worth paying attention to.