CZ wants to invest in an AI judge assistant: This idea is interesting.

Binance founder CZ recently shared a thought-provoking idea on social media—using AI to assist in legal judgments. Here’s the core logic:

What AI Can Do

• Learn all statutory laws and case precedents
• Propose recommended verdicts for each case
• Analyze public data (court records, precedents, information from both prosecution and defense, etc.)

Why It Might Be More Objective Than Human Judges CZ put it bluntly: human judges might be hungry, in a bad mood, or have political biases, but AI, in theory, is more neutral. Of course, the final effect still depends on the quality of its training.

CZ’s Attitude He doesn’t think any country will actually use AI to replace judges in the short term. But as an auxiliary tool for judges, lawyers, and parties involved? There’s potential. He also doesn’t think it’s particularly difficult to develop and even said he’s willing to fund a quality AI legal assistant.

Real-World Issues To put it simply, this idea is more about reducing the workload of the legal system than about AI ruling over the law. Judicial decisions involve many human factors, and AI algorithms can also be biased (after all, the case data it learns from may itself be problematic).

But this line of thinking is indeed worth exploring—in a compliant and transparent framework, AI can help analyze massive numbers of cases and identify patterns in verdicts, which could genuinely improve judicial efficiency. Now it’s just a matter of who’s brave enough to take the first step.