CZ’s Latest Idea: Using AI as a Judge’s Assistant

The core logic is this—let AI thoroughly learn legal statutes and historical cases, then have it provide judgment recommendations for each case. It sounds crazy, but CZ’s reasoning isn’t without merit:

Legal documents and court records are public, and in theory, AI can be more objective than humans. After all, judges can get hungry, be emotional, or be influenced by political stances (CZ’s own words).

CZ also acknowledges: no country will actually adopt this in the short term, and AI judges might not necessarily be better than humans—the key lies in the quality of training. But as a tool for judges, lawyers, and litigants to reference, it’s still valuable.

He even said, "This technology isn’t hard to develop, and I’d be happy to invest in a reliable AI legal assistant."

Honestly, this idea is very typical in the crypto community—using technology to solve trust issues. The legal system is no exception. While it’s still a long way from reality, as an idea, it’s quite imaginative.