According to Deep Tide TechFlow news, on November 26, Sandeep Nailwal, co-founder of Polygon and CEO of the Polygon Foundation, posted on social media discussing whether exchanges should be required to change the token trading code from POL back to MATIC.
Sandeep Nailwal stated that he continuously hears feedback from the Polygon trading community, believing that MATIC is a stronger and more familiar trading symbol, with historical significance and recognition, making it easier for people to remember.
His previous position was that it had already migrated to POL and should be consistently used, as enough people are now familiar with it. But the counterargument he received was, “The grocery store operators in the Philippines or Uber drivers in Dubai know MATIC, but they don't know where it went now.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Polygon co-founder discussed "Should the token trading code be changed from POL back to MATIC"
According to Deep Tide TechFlow news, on November 26, Sandeep Nailwal, co-founder of Polygon and CEO of the Polygon Foundation, posted on social media discussing whether exchanges should be required to change the token trading code from POL back to MATIC.
Sandeep Nailwal stated that he continuously hears feedback from the Polygon trading community, believing that MATIC is a stronger and more familiar trading symbol, with historical significance and recognition, making it easier for people to remember.
His previous position was that it had already migrated to POL and should be consistently used, as enough people are now familiar with it. But the counterargument he received was, “The grocery store operators in the Philippines or Uber drivers in Dubai know MATIC, but they don't know where it went now.”