When Facebook first launched, it seemed trivial: a college yearbook digitized, with no obvious business model. An older generation viewed it like a toy and couldn’t foresee how the company would one day monetize attention at global scale. The same skepticism surrounded Twitter. Once dismissed as a platform where people announced what they were eating for lunch, it slowly evolved into the nervous system of global politics and media. Even Roblox appeared to many as nothing more than a children’s video game. The platform has since revealed itself as a laboratory for virtual economies and user-generated worlds. Time after time, platforms that started as curiosities have grown into global cultural infrastructure and financial windfalls.
Pump.fun is at a comparable inflection point. For many, the team’s foray into live straming appears unserious, even absurd. Pump has consistently been dismissed as a memecoin sideshow destined to flame out. Dismissing it on those terms ignores their staying power and that they’ve consistently trounced competitors within weeks. Pump is laying the groundwork for an internet economy of a terminally online new generation. One in which culture and speculation are not adjacent but inseparable. With streaming returning to their product suite, they now set their sights on becoming the entertainment gateway for viewer-financial participation.
The streaming economy illustrates the limitations of an existing model and the opportunity for a new entrant to disrupt those incumbents, namely Twitch and Kick. Twitch, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amazon, takes 50% of every subscription, while mid-tier creators with 1,000 concurrent viewers may earn as little as $600 a month (only after you include subscription revenue, ads, and tips). Kick, backed by the gambling platform Stake, offers a 95%/5% split. The generosity of Kick is sustained through subsidy. A streamer who qualifies for Kick’s incentive programs may make more than $6,000 per month with the same audience size, nearly 10x what Twitch pays out. Yet the economics are artificial. They rely on Stake’s bankroll in hopes it brings new users to their online casino. The economic viability of these models don’t stand on their own two feet.
Rev. share model between incumbant platforms and creators
Pump’s incentive model attacks these contradictions head on, offering creators a way pull monetization forward. Streamers who launch a token no longer depend on subscriptions or advertisers. Creators can now mint demand directly through performance. The flywheel is simple: streams create speculation, speculation drives fee revenue, creators can choose to execute buybacks, buybacks generate narrative, and narrative feeds back into new streams. This is a unique selling point for the next wave of live streamers looking to innovate. Revenue isn’t constrained by audience size alone, but by the willingness of viewers to participate financially in the spectacle they are actively consuming.
This isn’t some minor shift in creator incentives. Pump reimagines what it means to perform online. A creator who earns $10m per year from sponsorships can commit a relatively small percentage towards token buybacks and the coin, tied to their online personality, suddenly behaves like an investment with recurring demand baked into its structure. The community ceases to be passive and chooses to become financially (and emotionally) invested in the creator.
Younger generations are leaning towards new media forms for their daily consumption of news and current events. Once you understand those consumption habits better, it’s entirely conceivable to imagine they will buy their favorite streamers’ coins (if not immediately, once they have the means or see the value in owning it). In this new incentive model, the most popular creators’ tokens could achieve valuations exceeding those of established technology firms. Investors and traders are buying something more than simple cash flows: they’re buying access to culture, identity, and community.
The scenario presented above isn’t purely hypothetical. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump, fresh off his election victory and the launch of his $TRUMP memecoin, offered the top 220 holders a spot at a gala dinner he hosted; the top 25 holders also secured a special VIP tour of the White House and were hosted at a private reception with the President. In total, these holders spent nearly $150 million to guarantee their positions. The announcement alone drove the token price up by more than 50%. As absurd as it may sound, this is the real life and it serves as proof that token ownership can deliver both financial return and tangible social access. In other words, Pump’s vision for streaming tokens becoming a cultural norm is already taking shape at the highest levels of celebrity and politics.
What critics miss is that Pump is professionalizing financial spectacle in the same way sports professionalized physical dominance and esports professionalized digital mastery. In the era of hyper-financialization, trading imitates art as much as art will imitate trading. Collapse is not disqualifying; it’s a narrative climax. A rug no longer marks the end of someone’s career; it’s a ritual that cements an anti-hero’s lore. Risk and loss are no longer flaws in the system but repackaged as content from which culture is created and shared.
Tokens will not remain speculative curiosities. They will continue to evolve into loyalty instruments that govern access, commerce, and community. Just as TikTok layered shopping into entertainment, Pump will embed spectacle into speculation. The distinction between financial and cultural participation will dissolve. Audiences won’t feel as though they’re watching from the stands, they’ll be cheering on the sideline. Viewership evolves into their own micro-economies: organizing treasuries, coordinating buybacks, and managing collective assets with various degrees of care or recklessness.
Humans have always signaled their values through performance. Rome had its gladiators. The industrial age had its athletes. The digital age had its gamers. The financial age will continue to place traders on a higher and higher pedestal. In the newest arena, there is no separation between spectator and participant. To watch a trader is to join them in a trade with one click. The highlight reel is no longer exclusive to slam dunks or Oscar-worthy performances. Performances will be shared alongside a parabolic chart, a liquidation cascade, or a dramatic buyback that reshapes a token’s price in real time. Finance is no longer taking a backseat; it’s riding shotgun..
Absurdity and obscenity are entirely subjective constructs. The longer something exists, the more widely it becomes accepted. The lesson from history is that what seems trivial in its early days often contains the seeds of transformation. Social networking looked like a toy before it became cultural infrastructure. Online dating was once ridiculed before it became routine. To some, creator coins appear to be meaningless noise. Once again, the skeptics will stand and wonder why they did not see it sooner.
Pump does more than simply bolt speculation onto streaming. It has the potential to rewire the relationship between creators, audiences, and capital into a system that’s both self-sustaining and scalable. Content generates demand. Demand generates buybacks. Buybacks generate culture. Culture generates more content. The loop is complete. We’ve created a flywheel.
Money is already culture. Pump is the first platform to acknowledge it openly and to build the rails for its expansion. The highlight reel of the next decade will be a chart.
It’s easy to dismiss Pump’s live streaming as another fad or a flash in the pan. It’s easy to share opinions saying that it won’t have staying power. It’s harder to look at the numbers pump is doing (revenue, distribution across various streaming categories, growing daily active viewers, etc.) and conclude there isn’t something there worth paying closer attention to. For those of you readers who’ve made it this far and fall into this category, try to temporarily set aside your skepticism, suspend disbelief, and consider what the future will look like in a few years. People on CT won’t shut up about hyper-financialization. They talk about it ad nauseum and lead you to believe it’s inevitable.
This is exactly what hyper-financialization looks like. And with last weekend’s breakout success, the Overton window has shifted. It’s hard for me to imagine we continue to live in a world where streamers feel the need to bend the knee to platforms like Twitch or Kick for distribution. I think it’s far more likely a generation of entrepreneurs will seize the opportunity to fuse live streaming and creator coins into engines of both cultural relevance and financial gain than the opposite. We’re already experiencing an accelerated form of capitalism: one that collapses entertainment and investment onto a shared stage.
The line between audience and stakeholder has already begun to blur. What appears absurd has only been in the spotlight for a week and is already doing insane numbers. It will feel more self-evident over time. Pump didn’t invent live streaming but it will push the format to its logical extreme. The team’s move into live streaming has the potential to catapult Pump into the cultural spotlight.
You may not approve. You need not participate. But Pump is offering a glimpse into an inevitable future. Don’t allow your feelings of discomfort to cloud your ability to see how easily the ground might shift under incumbents’ feet. It ordinarily happens much faster than anyone expects.