Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just reviewed the latest December employment data, and there’s something worth analyzing here. The unemployment rate fell to 4.4%, better than expected, but the labor market is telling a completely different story if you look closely.
Look, the headline number that sounds good is that unemployment fell. But when you dig deeper, the economy added only 50,000 jobs in December, well below the 70,000 anticipated. And this comes after the October and November data were revised significantly downward. In October, we lost 68,000 more jobs than initially reported, and in November, we lost another 8,000. In total, we’re talking about nearly 76,000 fewer jobs over those two months.
What’s interesting is how this is influencing decisions by the Fed. Krishna Guha of Evercore ISI noted that with this unemployment rate falling, the Reserva Federal is positioned to keep rates where they are in January and likely wait until March for any move. It makes sense if you think about it: the Fed sees a labor market improving in some indicators, so there’s no rush.
But here’s the detail that many people ignore. The average job creation over the last three months is negative, about 22,000 jobs lost. In 2025, only 584,000 jobs were added throughout the year, compared with 2 million in 2024. This is the weakest growth outside a recession since 2003. Lydia Boussour of EY-Parthenon put it well: this signals a clear slowdown in the labor market.
The participation rate remained steady at 83.8%, which is positive, but context matters. Some analysts, like Michael Feroli of JPMorgan, believe the labor market is stabilizing at a lower level of demand and supply, with no evidence of further weakening. But also without much growth.
Stephen Brown of Capital Economics has an interesting point: by March, the Fed will have two more months of data. That will make it possible to see whether the labor market is truly stabilizing or if it was just a temporary rebound. He believes the Fed probably won’t rush to cut rates, especially considering strong GDP growth projections.
So what does all this mean? It seems we’re at a point where the unemployment rate has stopped falling, but employment isn’t growing consistently either. It’s a strange balance. Boussour expects unemployment to rise gradually to 4.8% this year, and expects rate cuts in March and June, but that will depend on how the data evolve.
What I find key is that there are internal divisions within the Fed about what to do. Ellen Zentner of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management said that until the data provide clearer guidance, divisions will likely persist. In addition, the arrival of new regional presidents with more restrictive stances is complicating things.
In summary, the labor market is at a critical point. The employment rate isn’t collapsing, but it’s also not accelerating. The Fed is pausing, watching. And markets will likely need patience as this plays out. It’s one of those moments where the data tell multiple stories at the same time.