Solana Multi-Party Payment vs x402: A Battle Over "Enterprise-Grade" or "Openness" Strategy

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Solana Highlights MPP, x402’s “Openness” Becomes a Weakness

Solana’s tweet about MPP isn’t just announcing a new feature—it’s redefining its position: aiming to become the default infrastructure for “proxy payments,” bringing in enterprise players like Stripe and Tempo. In dissemination, 15 top influencers reposted, and developers discussed how good the SDKs are for stablecoin revenue sharing and payment delegation. 82K views, 841 likes? Numbers aren’t the point; the key is that the positioning has shifted. Comparing this to x402’s emphasis on “openness”—Coinbase’s protocol increasingly resembles a closed system built around USDC.

Media outlets like Bankless and ChainCatcher emphasize MPP’s fiat on/off-ramp advantages. But x402 handles 131,000 transactions daily, most of which are test noise, unable to prove real demand. This move by Solana actually redefines “openness”—in compliance and high-frequency micro-payments scenarios, openness isn’t an advantage but a risk.

Market and On-Chain: Little Volatility, Fundamentals Stabilized

  • Price dropped from $91.6 before the announcement to $88.5, then back to $92.6 on the morning of March 25, with around $4 billion in trading volume.
  • Liquidations only about $1,300, with bulls and bears roughly balanced, leverage not triggered.
  • On-chain metrics steady: TVL around $27.5 billion, DAU about 2 million, no significant outflows.
  • Transaction fees stable around $607,000, ranking 4th in market share (behind Polymarket and Bitcoin), indicating AI payment topics are indeed attracting Solana.

Developer @ludo_txtx appreciates the composability of revenue sharing features, extending discussions to how AI agents can be built. The current market state: sentiment isn’t overheated, positions aren’t crowded, and if data remains good, there’s room for growth.

What’s Next, Where Are the Risks

  • Institutional partnerships are a recent focus: SDP is pushing for integration with Mastercard and Western Union. If successful, enterprise RWA payments and settlements could come in, potentially pushing Solana’s stablecoin market cap toward nearly $650 billion by February 2026.
  • Tempo is a hidden risk: If MPP remains locked within Stripe’s ecosystem and Tempo’s licensing verification set, Solana becomes just a backend settlement layer with limited ecosystem spillover.
  • Derivative pricing is conservative: Few liquidations imply low leverage exposure. If DAU driven by proxy payments surpasses 2.5 million, upward elasticity warrants attention.

Analysis: Evidence, Impact, My View

Viewpoint Evidence Market Impact My Perspective
MPP is Solana’s enterprise killer app Stripe’s 2025 volume at $1.9 trillion; developer feedback focused on revenue sharing and delegated payments Shift from meme volatility to compliance payments, more stable long-term Slightly exaggerated: MPP is an important addition but not a redefinition. If retraced, it can be viewed as AI infrastructure exposure for strategic positioning.
x402’s openness surpasses MPP’s fiat channels Media comparisons; x402 claims 50 million transactions Triggers “openness vs. stickiness” hedging trades Unconvincing: Average transaction value ~$0.20, economic weight too light to prove scalable real demand.
Proxy narrative will soon bring capital inflows Social media spread, Solana ranks 4th in market share Retail chasing gains, but stable TVL and DAU suggest no clear migration from ETH/BTC Too early: If volume grows, perpetuals can follow; ecosystem building remains primarily the domain of institutions and teams.
Protocol disputes are zero-sum Visa CLI hedging news; Artemis reports x402’s 131K daily transactions Causes cross-chain tribalism, narrative unification hindered Incorrect framework: Hybrid paths will have an advantage. Solana remains relatively stable, mispriced by high-leverage competitors.

Mechanism Breakdown: Why Does MPP Win in Compliance Scenarios?

  • Narrative shift: from “fast chain” to “enterprise payment pipeline,” complementing Stripe and Tempo’s compliant clearing and settlement systems.
  • Mechanistic differences: Session-based payments natively support delegated fees and revenue sharing, suitable for high-frequency micro-payments and proxy execution; per-request mode suffers in compliance and cost predictability.
  • Data validation: prices initially fell then recovered during announcement; liquidations are minimal; TVL and DAU stable—market has orderly digested the narrative, chip structure remains resilient.

Future Watchpoints and Trading Strategies

  • Track SDP-led progress with Mastercard/Western Union, observing actual impact on stablecoin settlement volume.
  • Watch whether DAU can break 2.5 million under proxy payment drive, and if TPS approaches 10,000.
  • Monitor whether Tempo’s licensing restrictions affect larger ecosystems or if x402 can respond effectively on nanoscale payments.
  • Positioning: if on-chain activity and stablecoin settlement volume expand, with liquidations and funding rates still subdued, consider adding to positions; if volume growth is below expectations, revert to “builders first” valuation logic within the ecosystem.

Conclusion: The market is still early to mid-stage pricing Solana as “enterprise payment infrastructure.” Retail entry is somewhat late; the real beneficiaries are teams and funds doing integrations and building. If MPP can substantially boost DAU and TPS, secondary traders may find value; long-term holders should treat it as an AI and stablecoin settlement infrastructure exposure rather than a short-term hype.

SOL3.18%
BTC2.6%
ETH2.39%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin