Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#USProposes15PointPeacePlan
US Proposes 15 Point Peace Plan What You Need To Know
The United States has submitted a 15 point peace framework to Iran through Pakistani intermediaries in a major diplomatic effort to end the ongoing Middle East conflict. This comes at a time when military tensions remain high but parallel negotiations are now actively underway.
The conflict between the United States and Iran began after coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities during Operation Midnight Hammer. Since then the situation has escalated with continued missile exchanges and increased military deployments across the region under Operation Epic Fury. Despite this the United States is now pursuing a diplomatic route alongside ongoing operations.
The proposal was delivered through Pakistan which has emerged as a key intermediary. Pakistan’s leadership has played an active role in facilitating communication between both sides and has also offered to host formal peace talks. Other regional players including Egypt and Turkey are also involved in supporting diplomatic efforts. The initiative is being led by senior United States officials who are aiming to secure a temporary ceasefire lasting one month to allow full negotiations on the framework.
The plan places significant demands on Iran. It calls for the complete dismantling of nuclear capabilities along with a permanent commitment to not pursue nuclear weapons. It also requires zero uranium enrichment within Iran and the transfer of enriched material to international oversight. Key nuclear facilities must be dismantled and international inspectors would be granted unrestricted access. The proposal also addresses regional security by requiring Iran to step back from its proxy network and stop supporting armed groups. It includes guarantees for open global shipping routes and strict limitations on missile development restricting it to defensive purposes only.
In return the United States is offering major incentives. These include the full removal of international sanctions support for a civilian nuclear program and the elimination of mechanisms that allow sanctions to be quickly reimposed. One element of the proposal has not yet been publicly disclosed.
The United States leadership has expressed strong confidence in the negotiations stating that progress is being made and that Iran may be willing to agree to key conditions. Officials believe that current military pressure has strengthened their negotiating position.
Iran has publicly rejected claims that it is negotiating and has not confirmed agreement to any part of the plan. At the same time reports suggest that Iran has presented its own demands which include the removal of United States military presence in the region compensation for recent strikes and the ability to maintain full control over its missile program. These demands are viewed by United States officials as unrealistic.
Israel has been informed about the discussions but was not directly involved in shaping the proposal. Reports indicate that some Israeli officials prefer continued military pressure rather than a negotiated pause.
There are also concerns about the feasibility of the plan. Similar proposals have reportedly been rejected in the past and the current situation involves more complex issues including regional influence security guarantees and control over key trade routes. At the same time military operations are continuing without pause which adds further uncertainty to the diplomatic process.
The current approach reflects a dual strategy combining military action with diplomatic engagement. Whether this leads to meaningful progress or simply delays further escalation remains unclear. The next few days are expected to be critical as intermediaries attempt to bring both sides closer to direct negotiations.