Sei has a particularly critical but often underestimated point: transaction fees.

Sei is now one of the public chains with the lowest transaction fees among mainstream blockchains. As shown in the figure, well-known chains with relatively low fees, such as Sui, have fees that are 40 times higher than Sei; Sol, with fees 70 times higher... Not to mention the ETH chain with expensive gas, where fees are directly 1800 times higher than Sei.

This gap is not just about "being cheaper," but a structural advantage.

When viewed in scenarios like payments, P2P stablecoins, arbitrage, and high-frequency trading, the difference in transaction fees becomes very intuitive.

Therefore, it’s not hard to understand why:

P2P stablecoins 6 months +152%,
Daily active users 1.5 million, Monthly active users 15 million,
And this is before Giga is launched and before the C-end is fully rolled out.

Many chains like to promote low fees as a selling point, but in practice, only two types truly take off:
One is temporarily subsidized,
The other is inherently suitable for high-frequency use.

Sei clearly belongs to the latter.

When a chain simultaneously meets the criteria of: sufficiently low fees, stable performance, and infrastructure in sync, user growth and capital inflow are largely natural outcomes.

So, looking at Sei now, instead of asking whether the token price will take off, consider this question:
When everyone needs a low-cost, high-frequency, scalable chain, can they still avoid it?

@SeiNetwork