Recently, senior US officials announced a new policy targeting large institutional investors—banning these entities from purchasing single-family homes. According to the plan, the measure will be implemented swiftly, aiming to curb institutional capital expansion in the real estate market through legislative means. The logic behind this is simple: homes should be for living, not for speculation as financial assets.



The main purpose of this policy is to address the increasingly severe housing affordability crisis. Large institutions like Blackstone Group have been acquiring thousands of homes since the 2008 financial crisis, controlling supply to drive up rental yields. While this practice is profitable for institutional investors, it puts enormous pressure on ordinary homebuyers and renters.

Following the announcement, the market reacted immediately—Blackstone Group's stock price dropped by 9%. This indicates that investors are well aware that this ban could directly impact the profitability model of institutions in the real estate sector. However, there is still a question mark: will this ban be enforced through an executive order directly, or will it require formal legislative approval from Congress? The outcome of these two paths could be very different.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MelonFieldvip
· 2h ago
Blackstone is really going to suffer this time; it's high time to regulate these capital vampires.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 01-07 20:48
Blackstone drops 9%, now the capital dads are going to feel the pain.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorVikingvip
· 01-07 20:45
blackrock down 9%... honestly the regulatory pathway here will make or break this whole thing. executive order vs congressional approval? two completely different battle conditions. if it's just EO, watch the lawsuits come rolling in like a validator slashing cascade. the real test is whether the consensus actually holds when the lobbying starts.
Reply0
BloodInStreetsvip
· 01-07 20:43
Blackstone's cut was a bit too quick this time, dropping 9% directly... But the question is, can the ban really be implemented? Executive orders vs. congressional legislation, the two paths are vastly different. Those who missed out should probably be regretting now.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-07 20:39
Blackstone was really hit hard this time; a 9% plunge in stock price shows what the market is afraid of.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 01-07 20:31
Blackstone drops 9% haha, finally someone dares to go after these vampires
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 01-07 20:24
Blackstone is really hit this time, a 9% drop indicates that the market also knows this matter needs to be taken seriously. But I still have to ask, can this ban really be implemented...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)