2026-01-07 19:32:26

In this circle, some KOLs are indeed prone to repeatedly perform the same routines. The distribution of funding round information is uneven, with certain projects creating expectations through targeted invitations and early-stage financing mechanisms, then quickly boosting popularity through endorsements by influencers—this process has become a sort of default script. The problem is that when information asymmetry is severe, retail investors entering later become the final bagholders. How many projects are truly based on fundamental value, and how many are stories crafted through public opinion and financing round design? This is worth serious consideration for every participant.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoHistoryClass

· 18h ago

ngl, we've literally watched this exact script play out since 2017. information asymmetry as a feature, not a bug. the charts don't lie

Reply0

SocialAnxietyStaker

· 01-07 20:02

Here we go again. I'm already tired of this; the funding information gap is clearly just a tool to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingersFrontrun

· 01-07 20:02

Retail investors are always the last to know, this is the reality of Web3. I've seen through the play of funding rounds; it's a game of information asymmetry. To put it simply, fundamentals have long been overshadowed by funding stories. It's the same old routine, always the same flavor. Project teams and big influencers are in collusion; we are just the leeks. I think someone will have to take the bait again this round. Are you prepared? The information gap really hits home; it's just that we came too late. Sometimes I wonder if there is still any true value investing in this circle.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-07 20:02

I've seen through this trick long ago: big V influencers taking money for endorsements, retail investors getting exploited as the big fools. The fundraising rounds are just a scheme to repeatedly harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-07 19:43

Old tricks again. The way funding rounds are handled has been the same for so many years, which shows it's actually effective. Information asymmetry in fundraising is treated as routine operation. Retail investors deserve to be the bag holders? That logic really hits hard. Another project backed by a big influencer. Without even checking the fundamentals, it was overwhelmed by hype. These days, it's hard to tell whether it's the product that's good or the story that's easy to tell. It's a bit exhausting.

View OriginalReply0