There is a phenomenon worth noting—applications that are truly close to real-world business often see data scales spiral out of control.



Initially, it might just be a few KB configuration files, then evolve into tens of MB of user behavior records, and later into continuous streams of state data, logs, and derivative content. Everyone has experienced difficulties during this process.

Where is the core issue? In most decentralized storage solutions, the design logic assumes you won't frequently modify or adjust data. But once the data volume grows, the costs of updates and management complexity explode simultaneously. This is a well-known pain point.

Walrus chooses to intervene at this point, with a clear approach—its goal is not to let you "store more," but to keep the system organized as data continues to grow. Through an object-level storage model, data can expand while maintaining consistent identity identifiers. Currently, in the testing environment, it supports MB-level objects and ensures read stability through distributed node redundancy.

The fundamental change brought by this design is at the behavior layer. Developers no longer need to repeatedly perform tedious operations like data splitting, merging, or migration, allowing data structures to operate stably over the long term.

Honestly, the true value of such solutions often isn't apparent at small scales. The real test comes when data approaches the actual business volume. Risks are also very real—when the number of objects and node scale grow in tandem, network scheduling and incentive mechanisms still need more time to be validated. But if you've already started pondering questions like "how to manage data after a few months," then this direction isn't unfamiliar.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
nft_widowvip
· 11h ago
Hmm... It feels like solving an old problem. Who hasn't experienced data explosion? Only when it scales up do you realize what "pain" really means; you couldn't see it when you were young. But the walrus approach is indeed different. It's not about brute-force capacity, but about letting the data grow in an orderly manner. That's quite clever.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 01-07 19:46
Data loss is really a disaster; small files initially didn't anticipate an explosion later on. The pain points are indeed spot on, but whether Walrus's object model can truly handle real-world scenarios still depends. Existing solutions are all about storing for the sake of storage, without considering the update costs—that's the real trap.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegretvip
· 01-07 19:39
Data bloat has really hit home for me. At first, I didn't pay much attention, but later it became a hot potato. The Walrus approach is indeed different; it's not just about piling up capacity, but about solving the chaos in management during growth. That's the real pain point. --- To put it simply, current decentralized storage is either extremely expensive or not user-friendly. If Walrus can truly allow data to grow freely without getting out of control, then it's definitely worth paying attention to. But the network scheduling part lacks sufficient validation, and that's where the risk lies. --- Haha, everyone has been caught by data explosion before, and this problem framework itself is a good entry point. It all depends on whether Walrus can truly withstand the test of large-scale business. Passing small-scale tests is just the appetizer. --- I feel they've identified a long-overlooked point — the complexity of data management is far more critical than storage capacity. But the incentive mechanism still needs to be seen in subsequent iterations; it's too early to draw conclusions now. --- Yes, the object-level storage approach is a bit different. But to really deploy it in a production environment, it still needs to go through several rounds of testing with devilish details.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58vip
· 01-07 19:37
Data loss is something everyone learns about while stumbling through it. Going from a few KB to several GB is just mind-blowing.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-07 19:32
Data inflation is really incredible. It was KB when I was a kid, and now it's several TB, I have no idea what's going on. Walrus's approach is indeed a bit different.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 01-07 19:27
Data loss really, who hasn't stepped into a pit... But Walrus's approach is quite interesting, looking at old problems from a different perspective.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperervip
· 01-07 19:27
data bloat at scale hits different... walrus getting real about what devs actually face tho, not just theoretical storage math
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)