The American Bankers Association (ABA) Community Bankers Committee recently sent a letter to the Senate, urging that the upcoming "Crypto Market Structure Act" close the loophole allowing stablecoins to indirectly pay interest through exchanges. This battle over $6.6 trillion in deposits is stirring up a wave of regulatory concerns in Washington's financial circles.



The "GENIUS Act" passed last year was initially seen by the industry as a balancing point between traditional finance and crypto assets. The bill explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders, aiming to protect the competitiveness of bank savings accounts. It sounds quite strict, but the reality quickly changed.

Before the year is even half over, ABA has already found that money is still flowing out. According to a letter submitted to the Senate, leading exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken have found legal loopholes—they use the term "Rewards" to directly return Treasury yields to users. On the surface, the word "interest" doesn't appear, but the money flowing into user accounts is the same. Bankers pointed out sharply in their letter:

"These operations allow exceptions to swallow the rules, rendering the ban ineffective."

For ordinary investors, no matter what you call it, as long as money is credited, it’s attractive. Stablecoins can serve as deposits and can be transferred on-chain for withdrawal at any time. This flexibility combined with high yields is something traditional banks simply can't match. With quick liquidity and decent returns, who would want to lock their money in a bank account?

This impact on community banks is even greater. The Treasury Department estimates that if indirect interest payments continue to spread, the insured banking system in the U.S. could lose $6.6 trillion in deposits. For big Wall Street institutions, this might just be a number shift on the financial statements; but for small and medium-sized banks across the country, it’s a matter of survival. Once there is a large-scale outflow of deposits, the operational pressure on community banks will skyrocket, potentially leading to closures.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HodlTheDoorvip
· 21h ago
Haha, the bankers are panicking. Is the legal loophole really that big? Just changing the name of rewards and passing through—truly clever.
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybevip
· 22h ago
Haha, the bankers are panicking. They think they can fool regulators just by changing a name. Do they really think users are fools?
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFTvip
· 01-10 05:53
Haha, just say it. Can changing a name really fool the regulators? Rewards are just interest, I've seen this trick too many times in the NFT market. --- This round of stablecoins indeed threatens the foundation of traditional finance; 6.6 trillion is no small number. --- On-chain yields definitely outperform bank fixed deposits, no wonder ordinary people are attracted. --- Coinbase is just exploiting loopholes; the lag in legal regulation is obvious. --- Community banks are really being squeezed; this regulatory drama is far from over. --- To put it simply, it’s all about who acts faster. Financial innovation always stays one step ahead of regulation, it’s old news. --- I just wonder if the Senate will really close this loophole; it seems very difficult. --- Another tug-of-war between capital and regulation, with retail investors caught in the middle trembling.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGFvip
· 01-07 19:51
Haha, banker, you're getting desperate. Think we can't tell just because you changed the name? Rewards is just a disguise for interest.
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 01-07 19:51
Haha, the bankers are panicking. The trick of changing a name to fool people doesn't work at all in crypto.
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobiavip
· 01-07 19:51
Haha, the bankers are panicking. To put it simply, they can't stop the money from flowing onto the chain.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 01-07 19:48
Haha, the bankers are panicking. Basically, they're just afraid that the crypto world will take their jobs. --- Rewards are rewards. Anyway, I don't care how they package it; as long as there's profit, I'll invest. --- I know this trick well—changing the name to dodge regulations. It's an old tactic. --- Community banks are about to go bankrupt? That's not my problem. I only know that stablecoins are attractive. --- Wait, a loss of 6.6 trillion? Isn't that number a bit exaggerated? --- I believe that bans are just for show; laws will never keep up with innovation. --- So, in the end, traditional finance will also be eaten up. There's no way around it.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFearvip
· 01-07 19:25
Haha, the bankers are panicking, which shows that we've really hit their sore spot.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)