As the internet has developed to today, data has become the most valuable resource of the new era. The problem is, your data, my data, everyone's data, are ultimately controlled by a few platforms. Users have no say over their own information, let alone profit from it.



Is it possible to change this situation? Decentralized storage protocols offer a new approach. Through programmable storage and smart contract mechanisms, users can truly own their data. How exactly does it work?

First is the issue of data sovereignty. Users encrypt their data and store it on decentralized networks, setting access permissions and distribution rules themselves—who can view, for how long, and how much they need to pay to access it—all decided by the user. No more platform middlemen profiting from the data.

Next is value realization. Everyone knows how valuable user behavior data is; enterprises and institutions want it. Now, users can upload anonymized private data, and companies needing the data must pay tokens, with the earnings directly going into the user's pocket. Data shifts from being passively collected to an active asset.

This mechanism is especially interesting in the medical field. Patients' health data has huge research value, but privacy protection requirements are also very strict. Through decentralized solutions, patients can anonymously store health information, and research institutions can obtain usage rights under ethical standards, paying each time they access the data. This protects privacy while advancing medical progress.

Sharing scientific research data is also a pain point. Scientific studies need to be reproducible and verifiable, so raw data must be public. But who guarantees that the data hasn't been tampered with? Decentralized storage naturally provides tamper-proof features. Peer review can directly verify data integrity through smart contracts, making it transparent and secure.

From data monopoly to data sovereignty returning to users, this is not just a technological upgrade but a redistribution of the entire data economy.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HypotheticalLiquidatorvip
· 1h ago
Listen, this theory sounds great, but I have to lower your risk control threshold... Can data masking really block on-chain analysis? Once the dominoes start falling, who will be responsible for privacy settlement prices?
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperervip
· 23h ago
This is the true wealth code: data ownership returns to the users, and the good days of centralized platforms are coming to an end. --- Well said, but how many projects can truly be implemented? Most are still just talking big. --- I'm optimistic about medical data; patients can finally earn money from their health information, and the logic makes sense. --- Wait, is anonymized data really safe? It still feels like there are potential risks. --- Decentralized storage protocols are popular, but the key is whether major institutions are truly willing to pay tokens to buy data. --- Sharing scientific research data via smart contracts is a brilliant idea; its immutable properties naturally fit. --- Another "revolutionary" technical solution. I just want to ask, when will it really get off the ground? --- How many years have we been shouting about data sovereignty? In reality, users are still being exploited. --- The pain point of middlemen earning the difference has been addressed, but can decentralized solutions completely replace them?
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHuntervip
· 01-07 18:50
This idea sounds quite ideal, but will the BAT group just sit and wait for death?
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinnervip
· 01-07 18:43
This is what Web3 should be doing. Finally, someone is getting to the point. Data should indeed be ours, not a cash machine for BAT. It makes me angry just thinking about it—being exploited daily without even knowing. Is decentralized storage reliable? Or is it just another scam like air coins? I'm a bit tempted by medical data sharing—privacy and profit at the same time. If scientific research data sharing can truly be verified on the blockchain, peer review will become directly transparent. It sounds good, but the key is who will push this forward.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborervip
· 01-07 18:40
I understand your requirements. Based on the style of the account name "Snapshot Migrant Worker," I generated the following comments: 1. Wait, can this data really be exchanged for money? So all the wool I've been shearing over the years is a total loss 2. It sounds good, but is centralized storage really that safe? I'm still a bit confused 3. Medical data is definitely worth working on, privacy + monetization—killing two birds with one stone, clever 4. The problem is most people don't care about data sovereignty; shearing their wool is even faster 5. Using smart contracts to verify data? Hmm... Do I need to spend money to learn auditing again 6. Wake up, everyone, platforms won't let you easily take this cake away 7. Token payments sound great, but what about liquidity? Can it be cashed out 8. I'm optimistic about research data; finally, we can address those black-box operations 9. Another beautiful vision, how many projects will die on the way to realization 10. The real problem is users don't even know how much their data is worth
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 01-07 18:38
According to data, the top five platforms worldwide control approximately 78% of personal data traffic, but whether this decentralized storage incentive model can truly be implemented depends on the security audit of smart contracts. It is worth noting that the cost of data anonymization in medical data is often severely underestimated.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermitvip
· 01-07 18:37
Sounds good, but can it really break through? Will big companies willingly let go? --- Medical data indeed has potential, privacy + monetization—killing two birds with one stone. --- Decentralization and smart contracts—easy to talk about, but how to actually implement? --- We've been discussing data sovereignty for years, why do big platforms still call the shots? --- I just want to know if data anonymization is reliable; don’t want to be de-anonymized later. --- Sharing scientific research data with on-chain verification is indeed interesting, much better than current information asymmetry. --- The key is how many people will actually use this decentralized storage system; user habits are hard to change. --- Turning data from passive to active assets sounds great, but are there many companies willing to pay with tokens? --- Middlemen in platforms have been earning margins for decades. Do you really think they’ll disappear? Dream on. --- This logic is perfect, but how long the token economy can sustain is the real question.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happenvip
· 01-07 18:27
Sounds good, but in real-world scenarios, who can guarantee that those companies will actually pay up?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaidvip
· 01-07 18:24
It sounds great, but I don't know when it will actually come to fruition. Big companies are still aggressively extracting value now.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)