The stablecoin landscape needs a reality check. Most USD-pegged tokens are frankly underwhelming—they lack differentiation and real utility beyond basic transfers. WLFI isn't going to change that narrative either. What compounds the problem is how these coins operate within bundled ecosystems, creating artificial dependencies rather than genuine value propositions. Investors should be cautious here. The market is saturated with look-alike projects that don't bring anything fresh to the table.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 01-09 13:23
ngl, what this article says is quite accurate. The stablecoin sector is really a dead pond, just changing shells to continue harvesting the leeks...
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 01-09 01:25
Stablecoins are really a deep water, a bunch of rebranded projects are really pointless.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Bro
· 01-08 11:39
Honestly, these stablecoins are all the same, they serve no purpose other than transferring... WLFI probably can't save this situation either.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatcher
· 01-07 17:55
Nah, for real, the stablecoin market is just a stagnant pond, all copied and pasted stuff... WLFI is no exception, can't see what's different.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-07 17:55
ngl stablecoin this bunch of stuff is just a different flavor of the same old, WLFI can't save this situation... the ecosystem binding approach is really disappointing
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 01-07 17:50
NGL, stablecoin is really not that interesting, just a bunch of copy-pasted stuff...
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-07 17:47
Basically, it's just a bunch of copycat projects clustered together. The stablecoin track has been played out for a long time. Where is the real arbitrage opportunity...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTeller
· 01-07 17:43
Honestly, this wave of stablecoins is really not that interesting, just a bunch of copy-pasted stuff...
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 01-07 17:42
Stablecoin, this thing really has nothing new... it's just copying and pasting each other, no one really wants to innovate.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-07 17:29
Another clone stablecoin. Based on my quantitative model analysis, this type of project has already entered a clear bear market phase.
---
The stablecoin track is indeed saturated this time, but every time someone tries to do T, it turns out to be just an IQ tax.
---
Looking at historical data, this kind of ecosystem-dependent design has already been proven to fail before. Are they still repeating the 2017套路?
---
Again, it's just another indistinguishable USD-pegged coin. I don't see any breakthroughs, and risk warnings are at maximum.
---
From a market cycle perspective, launching such projects now is purely gambling psychology; the macro structure simply doesn't support it.
---
Honestly, the most虚 (meaning "hollow" or "superficial") part of these projects is the "ecosystem dependence" rhetoric. Smart people have seen through it.
The stablecoin landscape needs a reality check. Most USD-pegged tokens are frankly underwhelming—they lack differentiation and real utility beyond basic transfers. WLFI isn't going to change that narrative either. What compounds the problem is how these coins operate within bundled ecosystems, creating artificial dependencies rather than genuine value propositions. Investors should be cautious here. The market is saturated with look-alike projects that don't bring anything fresh to the table.