Nothing special, to put it simply, it's the redistribution of wealth within the community. Some make money, others lose, and the market is always doing this.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiDoctor
· 01-07 05:55
The consultation records show that this is a typical liquidity transfer symptom. The profit-making side's yield data looks good, but the outflow of funds from the losing side is obvious. The protocol itself has no issues; it's just that the players' risk warnings were not sufficient.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 01-07 05:53
No problem with that; anyway, the retail investors will always be retail investors, while the big players are harvesting.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 01-07 05:52
That's right, it's a zero-sum game; when some get on, others have to get off.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-07 05:50
There's nothing wrong with that; it's just a zero-sum game. The key still depends on who reacts faster and who is quicker on the draw.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobo
· 01-07 05:34
It's just a game of harvesting the little guys, it will always be like this.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMasked
· 01-07 05:26
Winners are always a minority; most people are actually just along for the ride. That's the truth of the market, isn't it?
Nothing special, to put it simply, it's the redistribution of wealth within the community. Some make money, others lose, and the market is always doing this.