Over the past two years, the performance of this public fundraising project has been quite bleak—



With a total funding goal of $5 million, only $1.54 million has been raised since the launch on the 3rd, and there are only 3 days left until the project ends. To ease the funding pressure, the project team has made multiple adjustments to the fundraising rules: the funding cap was lowered from an initial $15 million to $5 million, and the project valuation was simultaneously reduced from $300 million to $100 million. A more aggressive change was the removal of the individual investment limit of $2,500, as well as the abolition of the previous random allocation mechanism.

Despite these concessions, the funding downturn has not been reversed. The market’s true feedback is cold and unfeeling—the design of the 1-year lock-up period ultimately became the last straw crushing investor participation. This kind of design is especially prone to trigger hesitation in a bear market, causing many potential participants to hold back.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSquirrelvip
· 01-07 05:50
Haha, now it's all good. After changing it again and again, no one still buys in. --- One-year lock-up? Come on, who in a bear market would dare to take this on? --- Cut the valuation from $15 to $3, the project team's move is truly impressive. --- Only 30% of the funding has been completed. This pace is definitely doomed to fail. --- Canceling investment restrictions but no one comes? It shows the market has long since voted against it. --- Why do so many projects still want to play the lock-up game? They really haven't learned their lesson. --- Can there be a turnaround in 3 days? I bet 5 U that it's not possible.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFillervip
· 01-07 05:45
Who dares to lock up for a year? Playing this game in a bear market is really outrageous --- Changed the rules for so long but still no one wants it, indicating there is a problem with the project itself --- Valuation cut from 300 million to 100 million, a downward trend... Is there anyone willing to take over? --- Funding progress is so poor, the project team must be very anxious haha --- Lock-up for a year? Wake up, everyone. Who can afford to gamble in this market? --- Still unable to meet the quota after canceling the limit, I think it's a dead end --- Feels like a trap, luckily I didn't participate --- Still daring to play like this in a bear market, quite brave
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMOvip
· 01-07 05:44
One-year lock-up? No wonder no one is coming. Still daring to play like this in a bear market, truly courting death. Valuation cut from 300 million to 100 million, changing rules so frequently... Investors have long seen through it. Endless changes to financing rules indicate that the project team itself has no confidence, and they still expect others to come in? Cut from 15 million to 5 million directly, this modification is a bit outrageous, was the initial pricing that unreasonable? Locking for a year in this market? No wonder only 1.54 million was raised, I also have to wait and see. The project team is frantically changing rules, it feels like they are making their final struggle...
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 01-07 05:33
1-year lock-up? Bro, isn't that suicide? Still daring to play like this in a bear market... --- 154 million only funded 150 million, which is 20%. The project team changed the rules ten times but still no one is buying, this is market dominance. --- Cancel investment cap? Basically, they are panicking. Cutting valuation by two-thirds and still this bad, it's definitely a signal. --- It seems the project team wants to spend money to break through, but ends up realizing they can't make an impact... --- A 1-year lock-up is really poison in this market environment. I'll be honest, no one is willing to gamble on this. --- The prestigious 300 million valuation now only has a funding target of 5 million. The gap is quite big. --- Only 3 days left, feels like this funding round is going to fail... --- Changing rules again and lowering valuation, they look anxious and it shows on their face. --- Constantly changing rules can't save it, indicating it's not a process problem but that the project itself lacks attractiveness.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 01-07 05:33
1 year lock-up? How insecure do you have to be to play like this in a bear market, no wonder no one is coming --- Changing the rules three times still can't save it, indicating the problem isn't at the threshold... --- Only 1.54 million raised out of a 5 million target, what kind of project is this? It looks a bit ridiculous to me --- Valuation cut by two-thirds and still no buyers, this is probably the most honest market evaluation --- The wave of canceling limits is a bit desperate... to put it plainly, it's panic --- A 1-year lock-up and still trying to suck blood in a bear market? Dream on --- Looking at this fundraising progress, 3 days until the end, I bet 5 bucks that it won't make it --- The project has changed the rules so many times, investors have long lost confidence, who to blame?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)