Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
In March of this year, Trump signed Executive Order No. 14233, which stipulated that Bitcoin confiscated through criminal or civil proceedings by the government must be incorporated into the "U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve." The policy terms were clearly written, with a clear intention—to establish a dedicated Bitcoin strategic reserve system.
Fast forward to November, the U.S. Department of Justice instructed the U.S. Marshals to adjust the Bitcoin disposal plan. This series of actions has raised market questions: from commitment to execution, why has there been such a significant shift in the strategic reserve?
Looking at the entire timeline, from the signing of the executive order to the DOJ's instructions, it has only been 8 months. What does this rapid change in policy implementation reflect? Is it due to poor policy design, or are there practical obstacles at the execution level? Or does it involve a reassessment by the government of its Bitcoin asset allocation strategy?
Regardless, this policy adjustment is worth paying attention to—it directly affects the U.S. government's Bitcoin holdings and could trigger a chain reaction in the market.