Last year, stablecoins performed quite strongly on Ethereum, with issuers alone generating $5 billion in revenue through on-chain deployment. The logic behind this is actually quite clear—Ethereum as infrastructure significantly reduces the distribution costs of financial products. Compared to traditional finance, on-chain products have inherent advantages: low cost, transparency, high liquidity, and the ability to be freely combined. This is why more and more financial institutions are beginning to focus on Ethereum deployment; they can reach global investors at lower costs, and the products offered are more flexible and efficient. In simple terms, Ethereum is becoming the standard choice for the new generation of financial infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingersPaper
· 01-07 03:47
5 billion? That number sounds pretty impressive, but the ones really making money are still those big institutions. We're just retail investors waiting to be cut.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 01-07 03:45
$5 billion sounds impressive, but the real players are looking at gas fees—it's not cheap at all.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 01-07 03:42
$5 billion sounds impressive, but the real profit depends on who is arbitraging
---
Another argument: "Ethereum is the future of financial infrastructure." Wake up, everyone.
---
The claim of low cost and high transparency—why are CEX still bleeding users?
---
Are financial institutions really deploying seriously, or are they just following trends and hyping concepts? I need to see the data.
---
Stablecoin revenue is 5 billion, but what about the actual user gains? Are they being exploited again?
---
Free combination sounds great, but who will take responsibility for the risks of smart contracts?
---
Ethereum has become the standard option, but what about L2? The flow diversion is too fast, brother.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 01-07 03:42
50 billion dollars sounds impressive, but how many actually make real money? Just a tool for big players to harvest retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-07 03:30
$5 billion sounds great, but the ones who really make money are always those who deployed early. What can new entrants expect to get now?
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-07 03:19
$5 billion? That's a bit of a stretch, but it does show the power of stablecoins.
Last year, stablecoins performed quite strongly on Ethereum, with issuers alone generating $5 billion in revenue through on-chain deployment. The logic behind this is actually quite clear—Ethereum as infrastructure significantly reduces the distribution costs of financial products. Compared to traditional finance, on-chain products have inherent advantages: low cost, transparency, high liquidity, and the ability to be freely combined. This is why more and more financial institutions are beginning to focus on Ethereum deployment; they can reach global investors at lower costs, and the products offered are more flexible and efficient. In simple terms, Ethereum is becoming the standard choice for the new generation of financial infrastructure.