Recently, the Hyperliquid community has been actively discussing a suspected insider short-selling incident. Here, we summarize the background of the event and the official response.
**Event Details**
The incident originated from community members analyzing on-chain data, discovering that address 0x7ae4c156e542ff63bcb5e34f7808ebc376c41028 has been continuously selling HYPE tokens and opening short positions. Further tracing revealed that the early fund flows, testnet activity records, and historical transfers of this address all point to the Hyperliquid Labs development team. Suddenly, rumors such as "official team dumping" and "insiders profiting from information advantage" spread across the market, shaking the confidence of many investors.
**Official Clarification and Attitude**
In response to these suspicions, the Hyperliquid team issued a clear statement on Discord. First, they reaffirmed strict constraints on all related personnel—including employees and contractors: participation in HYPE token trading must adhere to a clear code of conduct, with a strict ban on derivatives trading and any form of insider trading, maintaining a zero-tolerance policy.
Regarding the short-selling address starting with 0x7ae4, the team confirmed that it belongs to a former employee who has already left the company. This indicates that the core issue is quite simple—the involved individual is no longer part of the team, and their actions do not represent the project's stance. This clarification is helpful in alleviating market sentiment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
wrekt_but_learning
· 01-10 01:09
The ex-employee's scapegoating tactic appears again. Is market confidence so easily restored? I feel like this isn't over yet.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 01-07 02:50
Former employees passing the buck, this trick is all too familiar... Just don't know if the regulators are truly strict or just talking the talk.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 01-07 02:45
Has the former employee's account not been frozen yet? How long does it take to discover this?
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-07 02:45
Employees dumping tokens before leaving the company, I just can't quite believe this reason.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-07 02:36
Former employees, huh? Then this matter can be considered settled, but it still depends on how it is handled afterward.
Recently, the Hyperliquid community has been actively discussing a suspected insider short-selling incident. Here, we summarize the background of the event and the official response.
**Event Details**
The incident originated from community members analyzing on-chain data, discovering that address 0x7ae4c156e542ff63bcb5e34f7808ebc376c41028 has been continuously selling HYPE tokens and opening short positions. Further tracing revealed that the early fund flows, testnet activity records, and historical transfers of this address all point to the Hyperliquid Labs development team. Suddenly, rumors such as "official team dumping" and "insiders profiting from information advantage" spread across the market, shaking the confidence of many investors.
**Official Clarification and Attitude**
In response to these suspicions, the Hyperliquid team issued a clear statement on Discord. First, they reaffirmed strict constraints on all related personnel—including employees and contractors: participation in HYPE token trading must adhere to a clear code of conduct, with a strict ban on derivatives trading and any form of insider trading, maintaining a zero-tolerance policy.
Regarding the short-selling address starting with 0x7ae4, the team confirmed that it belongs to a former employee who has already left the company. This indicates that the core issue is quite simple—the involved individual is no longer part of the team, and their actions do not represent the project's stance. This clarification is helpful in alleviating market sentiment.