2026-01-05 03:24:36

Recently, the international situation has been turbulent, and some seemingly intense geopolitical conflicts have not caused significant fluctuations in the crypto market. According to an analyst from a major asset management firm, although recent political tensions in the Americas have attracted attention, their actual impact on the digital asset market has been limited.

The analyst believes that the apparent military confrontations are unlikely to fundamentally reshape the diplomatic policy frameworks of the involved countries. At the same time, attempts to release energy reserves in certain regions through such events face practical difficulties. However, it is worth noting that these events often reinforce countries' determination to increase investments in defense and security sectors.

Currently, the market is behaving quite calmly, and major cryptocurrencies like BTC have not experienced drastic fluctuations. But this also reminds us that geopolitical risks are always a sword hanging overhead. Although the short-term market has not reacted strongly, long-term increases in security expenditures could alter global capital flows. For investors, maintaining ongoing vigilance regarding these factors remains essential.

BTC0.74%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GmGmNoGn

· 01-08 01:32

Uh... Geopolitical conflicts are like this, but BTC still remains unmoved. Something's not right. --- Increasing long-term security expenditures is the key; the crypto circle is still too short-sighted. --- It sounds nice, but in reality, the market simply isn't reacting. Anyone who believes otherwise is foolish. --- What's the point of staying calm? I think people are just numb. --- Releasing energy reserves is also difficult? Why are there so many excuses? --- No short-term volatility doesn't mean safety. Don't be fooled by illusions. --- Investors must keep an eye on geopolitical risks, or else a crash could happen one day. --- Why does this analyst sound so grandiose... Actually, no one cares.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 01-07 07:56

Alright, it's another post-hoc analysis like Zhuge Liang. Anyway, I can't understand geopolitical stuff or whatever; I just know as long as the coin doesn't drop, and safety expenses or whatever, I feel like I can't even touch my wallet.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomMiner

· 01-05 03:54

Ha, it's just a bunch of "geopolitical risks" again, I'm tired of hearing it. BTC is still there, regardless of conflicts or not. --- Will increased long-term expenses change capital flows? I can't buy that logic; it has never been that simple in history. --- Calm down? I think no one cares, and if there were a major crash, it would have exploded already. --- Increased defense spending... Hey, is it possible that this is actually the chips some big whales are holding? --- All this talk is just about "keeping an eye on it." How valuable is this analysis anyway? --- No short-term reaction, but long-term will respond? It's not even a weather forecast—why are you so sure? --- Is energy release difficult? Well, BTC isn't under much pressure; miners are sleeping soundly. --- I think, the real shock has never come from geopolitics, but from a single sentence from that guy at the Federal Reserve.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-05 03:54

Another wave of geopolitical crises is coming, yet the crypto world remains unmoved. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? BTC is really becoming more risk-resistant; it feels like nothing can shake it. In the long term, the increase in defense spending is indeed worth paying attention to. Whether the funds will eventually flow into new asset classes remains uncertain. The market's calmness makes me a bit anxious; I always feel like a sudden shock could come at any moment. Energy, military, capital flows... these are interconnected, and short-term stability might just be the calm before the storm. Continuous observation is necessary. Anyway, since lying around, might as well take a few more looks.

View OriginalReply0

MonkeySeeMonkeyDo

· 01-05 03:54

What are people in the crypto circle watching? Geopolitical tensions are exploding but Bitcoin remains still, and instead my mental resilience is collapsing. --- Is increasing long-term safety expenditure? This logic feels like an excuse to justify a price rally later... --- Stay calm, what a joke. I think this is the calm before the storm. --- Difficulty in energy release, diplomatic framework unchanged... How does this analyst's comment sound like they're saying "Don't worry, it's fine," which makes me even more uneasy. --- It's more terrifying when BTC shows no volatility. When volatility finally hits, us retail investors will have already been squeezed dry. --- So should I hoard coins now or run away? This article has been talking for so long but still hasn't given a clear answer. --- Increased defense spending flowing into crypto assets? I don't see the logical chain here, please enlighten me. --- No reaction in the short term ≠ no problem in the long term. This statement sounds like it was never said, bro.

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 01-05 03:50

To be honest, with the geopolitical situation so turbulent, BTC remains quite stable, which makes me more worried that the upcoming surge in national defense spending will drain liquidity.

View OriginalReply0

TeaTimeTrader

· 01-05 03:38

The crypto world is like this: when the wind starts to blow, the market still seems unaffected, numb to it all. Why is BTC so resilient? It should have risen long ago. Honestly, the geopolitical issues have long been digested, and capital has already moved to defense stocks. This wave of the market is a bit cold; I can't quite understand the direction. Will increased defense spending have a long-term positive effect on the coin price? Or is it a negative signal? Staying calm is important, but I still want to add to my position and take a gamble. Talking about long-term risks again, as long as it can rise in the short term, that's enough.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-05 03:24

Short-term calmness is often the most dangerous signal. I've seen too many people relax their position management during such times. Rebuilding supply lines after geopolitical events might be the real long-term killer. --- Don't be fooled by the market's lack of volatility; this is a typical prelude to a false breakout. History has shown me that during periods of surging defense spending, capital flows tend to undergo significant adjustments. --- Calm? I think the market hasn't reacted yet. Once safety investments truly kick in, it'll be too late to adjust your positions. That's why I insist on avoiding excessive leverage. --- So, when the surface appears calm, you should be even more vigilant. The difficulty in energy release is interesting; it suggests that inflation expectations may remain high for a long time, which could have a profound impact on the valuation of cryptocurrencies. --- Having played for so many years, I am increasingly convinced of one principle: the most dangerous enemy is not a sharp decline, but the calm that you think is safe. Not hedging risks now will cost you in loss control later. --- BTC not moving doesn't mean there's no danger. My experience is that the real test comes three to six months after geopolitical conflicts. Establish defensive positions early; survival is the priority.

View OriginalReply0