Seeing GlintAnalytics, I think what it aims to do is quite interesting: using AI to extract the bones of market data, telling you whether capital flows are driven by genuine interest or emotional panic. But the more I think about it, the more I feel the key might not be in what it reveals, but in what it doesn't reveal.

┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ My niche perspective: ┃
┃ It might be an excellent ┃
┃ cognitive bias alert ┃
┃ rather than a market predictor. ┃
┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛
Personal interpretation path:
Filters and Reality
All AI models are filters of training data.
The truth of Glint is the truth of its dataset.
When the market introduces a completely new narrative, how will untrained patterns be interpreted?
Conflicting value
Its greatest utility may be when its conclusions conflict severely with your intuition.
Such conflicts push you to validate deeply; the process is more valuable than the conclusion.
It acts as a partner that always questions, “Why can't it be another possibility?”
$GLNT 's potential role
If only used as a signal tool, it can be easily replaced.
If it becomes a standard part of the decision-making workflow, its value is different.
Imagine: before each operation, habitually use it to scan for data blind spots you haven't considered.
In short:
While everyone chases Alpha answers, its long-term value might be helping us manage cognitive debt—clarifying the thinking debts we owe due to information overload, biases, and emotions. If this positioning holds, it’s not entering the crowded analysis tool race but rather focusing on more fundamental decision hygiene habits.

It doesn't make you more brilliant, but it might make you more clear-headed and solid. In this market, the latter may be more scarce.

@GlintAnalytics @cookiedotfun @cookiedotfuncn #Cookie