A well-known figure once said something very interesting: "Gold is just Bitcoin that cannot be transmitted over the internet."

The reason this viewpoint resonates with many people is not because it praises a certain asset, but because it touches on a key issue — in the digital age, our understanding of "value" itself is undergoing a transformation.

Looking back thousands of years, gold served as a "store of value," for straightforward reasons: limited quantity, impossible to artificially increase, recognized by civilizations throughout history. But the digital era has rewritten these rules. Gold's shortcomings are beginning to show — difficult to transfer, cumbersome to divide, high cross-border costs, and reliance on intermediaries like banks or vaults.

What does the emergence of Bitcoin solve? From a mathematical perspective, it guarantees a supply cap; network design makes global transfers possible; the entire mechanism is free from control by a single institution. Imagine this scenario: on a Sunday midnight, an asset worth billions can be transferred across the globe in minutes, almost without trusting any third party. This is simply unthinkable in traditional finance.

The true meaning of this is quite simple: **When the internet becomes infrastructure, the carrier of value itself must also be "natively online."** Bitcoin is not meant to defeat gold, but to exist in response to a brand new era — an era where assets need to move quickly, cross geographical boundaries, and not rely on centralized institutions.

As more institutions and capital begin to recognize this logic, Bitcoin's value transcends mere price fluctuations, becoming a long-term game about the future form of currency, trust mechanisms, and even financial sovereignty.

Perhaps the future is not the disappearance of gold, but that value itself is gradually being moved onto the internet.