Is making stable profits really that difficult? It seems like a decent win rate, but there's more to it.



The difficulty isn't in whether you're profitable, but in most people operating with a "doomed-to-fail strategy." The win rate data you see is actually quite good. The real issue is—what truly determines the direction of an account isn't how many wins you have.

**First Pitfall: Win rate numbers can be deceiving**

Someone with a 40% win rate can still see steady account growth—because they take big profits when they win and control losses when they lose. Conversely, some with a 70% win rate might blow up their account with a single heavy position, losing everything they earned before. That's why just looking at win rate is useless.

**Second Pitfall: Position sizing determines life or death**

It's not the market being bad; it's yourself sabotaging your own success. Full positions, crazy leverage, ten trades a day—no matter how bullish the market is, these tactics won't save you. The traders who last the longest share a common trait: they start small, test the waters, and add positions once they gain confidence. This isn't being timid; it's the essential lesson for surviving the casino.

**Third Pitfall: Stability depends on systems, not luck**

How long can a trading logic that can be repeatedly executed last? It's worth far more than a hundred strokes of luck. The market rewards those who can stay in the game consistently, not the most aggressive or crazy traders.

So, when asked "Is making money hard?"—if you use the right methods, it's not. If your methods are wrong, all market conditions are useless. The true winners are those who understand these three points.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 3h ago
Basically, most people die at the step of full position sizing. It's true. Only after seeing others get wiped out with a 70% win rate did I realize that staying alive is more important than winning. The phrase "light position to explore" hit me hard. I feel like I was that fool who kept adding leverage recklessly before. System > luck, I agree with this logic. Fancy win rate statistics can't fool the account curve, right? These three pitfalls seem to be what the entire crypto circle is falling into.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 3h ago
Sounds about right, the full-position folks won't survive more than two bull markets.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomadvip
· 3h ago
Honestly, a 70% win rate and a complete liquidation in one shot—this part really hits me. Some people just deserve it.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 3h ago
Full leverage trading multiple times a day is indeed courting death. A few older brothers I know lost their lives this way, and it looks quite heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)