Skeptics keep calling it a scam, but I'm not entirely convinced. The GitHub repository actually looks solid—too polished to be vaporware. Drawing comparisons to successful Solana projects like Aster and Hype, there's something here worth watching. Sure, it took two major dumps, and that stings. But the development activity tells a different story than typical rug pulls. The real question nobody's asking: has anyone actually tested the tech stack? That's what matters. Code doesn't lie, and neither do usage metrics. Until I see concrete technical failures, I'm holding my bearish take. The infrastructure might be legit even if market sentiment isn't.

SOL1.6%
ASTER-0.21%
HYPE-1.57%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiAnonvip
· 3h ago
Code doesn't lie, but how long can those shiny commits on GitHub fool us?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 3h ago
ngl GitHub seems to have people actually working, not like those pure scam projects. Can code deceive? No, it can't.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollectorvip
· 3h ago
Code doesn't lie; GitHub looks so solid, it really has something.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anonvip
· 3h ago
GitHub doesn't really look like a trash project, but I can't say it's completely stable either.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 3h ago
Can code deceive people? Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)