When it comes to the most legendary duo in the crypto world, Dogecoin and a certain tech billionaire are undoubtedly at the top.



Remember that night in 2021 when this billionaire casually blurted out the word "scam" on a variety show, causing Dogecoin to plummet 40% instantly? The chat groups exploded: some posted screenshots of margin calls, others cursed this guy as a "dog whale," and some nervously asked—should we buy the dip? Isn’t he still planning to pump the coin?

Such conversations have been looping endlessly over the past few years. The relationship between Dogecoin and this billionaire is no longer just a simple "endorsement"; it’s a crazy performance of mutual dependence. But behind the cheers, project teams, retail investors, and even the billionaire himself are trapped in an inescapable vicious cycle.

**From "Point Your Finger and Make Gold" to "Diminishing Effect"**

Before 2019, Dogecoin was just a small joke on Reddit for tipping and teasing, with a price below $0.001. The real turning point came from a social media post: "Dogecoin might be my favorite crypto." What happened next? Dogecoin skyrocketed 800% within 24 hours.

Since then, every move by this billionaire has become a barometer for the coin’s price:

- In February 2021, he tweeted "Dogecoin is the people's currency," and the price doubled that week;
- In May 2021, he called it "a scam" on a popular talk show (later clarified as a joke), causing a 34% flash crash;
- In December 2025, he retweeted a badge from an American politician about the "Government Efficiency Department (DOGE)," which pushed the price up 8% that day, only to be wiped out by the close.

But recently, this snake has started to swallow its own tail. Since 2025,

**Influence is Rapidly Fading**

Market reactions have noticeably slowed. What used to trigger a surge with a single tweet now only lasts a few hours. Retail enthusiasm has waned, and institutions and big players have become smarter—after seeing so many tricks, who still follows the hype?

Even more painfully, Dogecoin’s fundamentals haven’t improved much. Originally designed as a joke, its practical use cases remain limited, and the ecosystem is hardly developed. The entire price movement is essentially driven by sentiment and celebrity effects.

**Who Is Paying for This Game**

The project team is caught in a dilemma: if the billionaire keeps speaking out, the market might become numb from habit; if he stays silent, there’s no hype material. Retail investors are even worse off, always ready to be harvested—some bet he will keep hyping (only to get trapped), others bet he will walk away (also getting caught).

Ironically, even the billionaire himself seems a bit tired. His occasional comments have shifted from confident assertions to occasional jokes, as if testing how long this game can last.

**What’s Next**

The crypto market has always been fickle. Every new narrative, concept, or wealth-creation story can divert some liquidity. For Dogecoin to regain its peak, it needs new imagination—otherwise, relying on a single billionaire’s words is a dead end.

This six-year parasitic carnival has taught everyone one thing: no matter how crazy the hype, there will come a day of diminishing returns.
DOGE-1,43%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinHuntervip
· 6h ago
One person's tweet can cause an 800% rally, now not even a single one can lift it. This is called falling from the pedestal... --- Honestly, the era when a single sentence could double in value is truly gone. The market has long been immune. --- So is Dogecoin now just an empty shell with no story? It’s been hyped for 6 years without any fundamental improvement? --- I just want to know what the mindset of people holding Dogecoin now is... --- Ironically, everyone knows it’s a game of cutting leeks, but they still rush in. --- The decline of celebrity effect shows one truth: even the most compelling narrative can become tiresome if overused. --- It’s 2025 and people are still hoping for a tweet? I think project teams should start thinking about how to build the ecosystem. --- Retail investors trapped are truly hopeless. Betting right loses money, betting wrong also loses money. --- Isn’t this the most authentic portrayal of the crypto world? All the hype eventually succumbs to diminishing marginal returns. --- Dogecoin is like an eternal stage play; the actors are tired, and the audience is bored.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingBeachfrontVillvip
· 6h ago
The dog is already useless!
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezervip
· 7h ago
To be honest, this trick has been exposed. Are there still people betting on this guy's words?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidatorvip
· 7h ago
Basically, it's just a game of harvesting the leek, don't overthink it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fcvip
· 7h ago
I've been waiting 6 years for him to tweet, how much can I deceive myself?
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercodervip
· 7h ago
Basically, it's just hot potato; we've been playing it for too long and should be tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 7h ago
A typical case of incentive distortion, no one can escape this game-theoretic equilibrium. --- In simple terms, it's a governance inertia, retail gamblers, project teams powerless, and in the end, everyone becomes conspirators. --- The term diminishing marginal returns is well-used, but in fact, the centralization trap was set from the very first tweet. --- It's ironic that even celebrities are trapped by their own influence, and this is called incentive distortion. --- The mechanism flaw is right here; reliance on a single point is death. --- I've seen too many such projects; trust costs are ultimately passed on to the bagholders. --- Poor balance of rights and interests leads to this vicious cycle. --- Human weaknesses are fully exposed; who profits and who loses depends entirely on how much narrative and heat remain. --- That's why I am skeptical of any governance scheme, because you simply can't escape the binding of interests.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)