2025-12-31 02:21:10

Recently, senior executives of leading investment institutions publicly stated that increasing Bitcoin holdings is beneficial for long-term shareholder returns. What are their reasons? The companies are actively seeking new untapped capital to drive the growth of digital credit business demand.

Industry-renowned investor Andrew Kang is more straightforward—there is still significant room for Bitcoin's future rise, and it is not the end. This view reflects the consensus among an increasing number of institutional investors: BTC, as a core digital asset, still holds strategic allocation value in the current macro environment.

From a market perspective, the continued optimism of institutions is not unfounded. The integration of crypto assets with traditional finance is deepening, and institutional investors are using Bitcoin to hedge inflation risks and expand revenue channels, which has become a stable long-term trend. The increased holdings signals from these leading institutions further strengthen market confidence in BTC's long-term prospects.

BTC1.2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StableGeniusDegen

· 4h ago

Institutions are really starting to realize that BTC is not just a speculative asset; it's a hedging tool. Another Andrew Kang has appeared... Just listen, but making your own judgment is most important. Buy more signals are everywhere; I just want to see who can hold on without selling at a loss. Fusion? Inflation hedging? Sounds sexy, but those who truly make money are always the ones willing to go all in. Is there any fundamental difference between this round of institutional entry and the last? Still just to shake out retail investors. Long-term trend? I only look at candlestick charts. Institutions entering now will regret it sooner or later. Just wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 4h ago

What does institutional buying of Bitcoin indicate? It's just that they’re also worried about inflation, just like retail investors. Andrew Kang is right, there’s still a lot of room for BTC, it’s far from over. The logic behind these big players increasing their holdings is actually very simple—there’s no asset more resistant to risk than this. It’s truly become a consensus; even traditional finance is starting to embrace crypto. The times are changing. To be honest, if institutions are optimistic about us, we should follow their lead. Their money doesn’t lie. I believe in the integration trend, I just don’t know how long it will take to truly materialize. Good job on increasing holdings! It seems major institutions are also starting to panic, afraid of missing this train. Hedging inflation is brilliant; Bitcoin is like the modern version of gold. Hmm, it feels like more and more traditional bigwigs are entering the market. Is this a sign of a bear market? The long-term trend is right here; it’s something you can’t run away from.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 4h ago

Institutions should increase their Bitcoin holdings, but don't forget that the most dangerous moments are often when they speak nicely. Andrew Kang says there's plenty of room, so let the bullets fly a bit longer. Inflation hedging, digital credit... sounds grand, but can it really guarantee long-term returns? This wave of consensus seems a bit too uniform; it feels like something is about to change. While institutions are bottom-fishing, ordinary people are still buying high. Do they really just want to hedge against inflation? They’re in it to make money off retail investors, okay? BTC still has room to grow, but where is that room? Do they get to decide? Integration? I see it as just a new tool for slicing the leeks again. If you believe in it, then believe in it. Don’t throw so many high-sounding words to fool people. Institutional holdings ≠ your ability to make money. Remember this equation.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 4h ago

The fact that institutions keep increasing their positions indicates that big players are starting to panic... Inflation pressure is right there, and Bitcoin is indeed the last safe haven. That said, I still want to see how high it can go... Andrew says there’s no end, so just keep holding. Integrating traditional finance? That’s a bit risky, it feels like one day if policies change, these institutions will all have to run. It’s basically a bet on macroeconomic changes, betting on this move, nothing new.

View OriginalReply0

BoredApeResistance

· 4h ago

Is it the same old story again, that institutions buy more and everyone follows suit? I don't think so. Wait, this time it seems different, the fusion trend is right here. Andrew Kang said there's still room, but I want to know where the ceiling really is. This wave of inflation hedging logic is indeed solid, and compared to US bonds, BTC is more attractive. Institutional endorsement definitely reassures the market, but retail investors still need to be cautious. It all sounds right, but why do I still feel a bit uneasy? We've been talking about hedging inflation for years, can we stop using it as a pretext all the time? Long-term prospects? I just want to know how much it can rise next year.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 4h ago

Institutions' recent moves are basically paving the way for their asset allocation. BTC still has stories to tell. Breaking new highs for BTC is not the point; the key is how these big players are handling it. Their appetite determines the market trend. Everyone is accumulating, so let's follow suit. Anyway, inflation is here, and we need to find a place to put our money. Talking about strategic allocation value... it's really just about fear of missing out, haha. The rhetoric about hedging inflation has become tiresome, but it’s actually effective. Wait, are these institutions really buying or just talking? That’s very important. Andrew Kang is right; BTC is far from the end, but be careful chasing highs now. Fusion, fusion—ultimately, retail investors get hurt, and it’s really annoying to watch. The buy-in signal is here; is this the start of a takeoff?

View OriginalReply0