2025-12-30 09:24:06

In the past two years, I've heard too many voices criticizing FIL. "Old-fashioned project"

FIL-0,74%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-7b078580

· 2h ago

Although, the data shows that miners are consuming too much, and the mechanism itself is unreasonable. Hang on, the historical low hasn't been reached yet.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 2h ago

I'm numb from listening, but FIL really underperformed quite badly.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 2h ago

The mechanism design is fine; the problem is that the incentive compatibility has collapsed. Look at the storage game of IPFS; the principle is not broken, it's just that the market pricing power is unbalanced—this is the real lesson.

View OriginalReply0

MetaNeighbor

· 2h ago

There are many people bearish on FIL, but I still hold the coin... Anyway, this thing is either going to die or not, so I might as well keep it flat and continue to stay put.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 2h ago

Listening to these people talk nonsense, FIL should have died a long time ago, so why is it still alive?

View OriginalReply0