Interesting comparison discovery—having Gemini give Manus, the project name, a pulse, its evaluation is stable and reliable; switching to Doubao for assessment, the feedback appears quite ordinary. Looking at the judgment results of these two AIs, it seems that when it comes to naming diagnostics for crypto projects, Gemini's vision is indeed more insightful and better at capturing the solid feeling embedded in the project name. This provides many insights for choosing AI tools to assist in project evaluation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperer
· 5h ago
Gemini's vision is indeed good, but Doubao is a bit disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 5h ago
Gemini definitely has something, Doubao this time really underperformed.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 5h ago
Gemini is indeed tough, Doubao really let us down this time.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 5h ago
Gemini really has something, Doubao really underperformed this time.
Interesting comparison discovery—having Gemini give Manus, the project name, a pulse, its evaluation is stable and reliable; switching to Doubao for assessment, the feedback appears quite ordinary. Looking at the judgment results of these two AIs, it seems that when it comes to naming diagnostics for crypto projects, Gemini's vision is indeed more insightful and better at capturing the solid feeling embedded in the project name. This provides many insights for choosing AI tools to assist in project evaluation.