Interesting comparison discovery—having Gemini give Manus, the project name, a pulse, its evaluation is stable and reliable; switching to Doubao for assessment, the feedback appears quite ordinary. Looking at the judgment results of these two AIs, it seems that when it comes to naming diagnostics for crypto projects, Gemini's vision is indeed more insightful and better at capturing the solid feeling embedded in the project name. This provides many insights for choosing AI tools to assist in project evaluation.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperervip
· 5h ago
Gemini's vision is indeed good, but Doubao is a bit disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroupvip
· 5h ago
Gemini definitely has something, Doubao this time really underperformed.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmilingvip
· 5h ago
Gemini is indeed tough, Doubao really let us down this time.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHolevip
· 5h ago
Gemini really has something, Doubao really underperformed this time.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)