2025-12-30 06:25:51

$ZEC $ZBT $DOGE

Bitcoin fluctuates around 87,000, and many are asking whether to buy the dip. But this question itself is wrong.

Consolidation is not accumulation; it’s the market re-pricing itself. Some are quietly tightening the "water tap" of liquidity.

**What’s happening at the policy level**

Recent moves in the US policy circle are worth paying attention to. Trump’s attitude towards the new Fed Chair candidate appears to be "dovish" on the surface, but what he actually wants is a power reorganization—gradually shifting control of interest rates and liquidity from the Fed to the Treasury Department. What does this mean? Future policies will become more unpredictable, and market volatility will increase.

Meanwhile, the Fed talks about possible rate cuts, but in practice, they are reducing actual liquidity. Recently, gold and Bitcoin have both plunged together, which is not a coincidence but a systemic signal.

**Hidden cracks in market structure**

Data speaks volumes. In the past two months, crypto ETFs have outflows of nearly $4 billion. This doesn’t mean institutions are pessimistic; rather, leveraged players are being forced to cut losses. On one side, institutions are still adding positions (faith remains), while on the other side, funds are continuously withdrawing—market divergence has become absurd.

In this split state, any single factor could trigger a chain reaction.

**Two key price levels**

Looking upward, 89,000 is the first critical level. If it can be effectively broken through, a light position can be tested. But this requires confirmation of increased capital entering the market.

Looking downward, 85,000 is the life-and-death line. If it breaks, the market may develop panic expectations, triggering a chain of sell-offs. This level is particularly prone to a stampede.

**Most practical advice**

During this period of policy chaos, preserving capital is more important than catching every wave.

First, better to miss out than to make mistakes. Greed can be especially deadly during consolidation.

Second, position management always comes first. Full positions are the most foolish choice in this environment. Even if the direction looks correct, volatility can wipe you out.

Finally, accept uncertainty. During this time, policy signals are vague, and market sentiment is volatile. Surviving is already winning.

Consolidation will eventually end, but before it does, the key question is—who is really controlling the rhythm of this market?

ZEC3.22%

ZBT-10.65%

DOGE0.15%

BTC0.87%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseVagabond

· 7h ago

Liquidity tightening is a well-captured detail. What’s the market doing? Just accumulating strength? No, it’s just a shakeout. Those caught in the trap should wake up. --- E85,000 is really a threshold. Once broken, a chain reaction of sell-offs will follow. I’m scared and will cut my position directly. --- How hard must it be for those fully invested now? That’s the price of greed. --- With policies so chaotic, instead of chasing hot topics, it’s better to lie flat. Just surviving makes you a winner. --- Are institutions still adding positions? I think they’re just being stubborn; funds have already started to flee. --- Trump’s move to reorganize power is quite fierce. No wonder the market is so unstable. --- Claiming to cut interest rates while actually shrinking liquidity—this trick has really been played out. --- If I can’t break through 89,000, I’ll just keep waiting. No rush; I don’t have that much idle cash anyway. --- That $4 billion outflow is enough to explain the problem. Don’t be hostage to institutional faith. --- Gold and Bitcoin both plunging—using the term “systemic signal” is spot on.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 7h ago

If 85,000 is broken once, will there really be a stampede? It feels like this policy window period isn't that pessimistic yet. People holding full positions are probably eating dirt now. I'm just glad I didn't go all in. During sideways trading periods, it's easiest to get cut. It's better to wait and see for now. This liquidity contraction is indeed a bit strange. Why are institutions still increasing their positions? It's better to miss out than to make a mistake. This phrase really hits the heart. The price is hovering around 87,000. Should we wait and see if 89,000 can break through? As long as you're alive, you've already won. This is the most rational attitude right now.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 7h ago

85,000 breaking will really cause a stampede this time is different --- Those who have been holding during the sideways market should reflect on themselves --- The tightening of liquidity... there’s definitely something to it --- Are institutions still adding positions? To me, it looks like they’re just trading with each other --- The phrase "admitting uncertainty" really hit me; surviving is already a win, that’s true --- Trying a light position at 89,000 is okay, but the question is, who has the patience to wait --- When policy signals are vague, don’t just mess around; capital preservation is the key --- 4 billion in outflows, this time the disagreement is really big --- Power restructuring affects liquidity... I need to think about this logic --- Instead of trying to bottom fish, it’s better to first consider your stop-loss level

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 7h ago

Liquidity is tightening, and right now, all the greed is among the retail investors. --- Once 85,000 breaks, the stampede will begin. My intuition has never been wrong. --- With such chaotic policies, how can those holding full positions still sleep well? --- Are institutions adding positions? I think they are unloading. Don’t be fooled. --- Let’s wait and see who controls the rhythm. Currently, any involvement is just gambling with luck. --- Gold and Bitcoin plunging together, this signal couldn’t be more obvious. --- Better to miss a thousand times than make one mistake. That’s no lie. --- If 89,000 can’t be broken, there’s no hope. After such a long consolidation, they’re definitely accumulating. --- ETF outflows of 4 billion, leverage is being cleared, it will get even worse next. --- As long as you’re alive, you’ve already won. That’s the real truth.

View OriginalReply0

PortfolioAlert

· 7h ago

Honestly, the 85,000 line really needs to be watched closely. Once it breaks, it's game over. 4 billion flows out, leveraged players are still being washed out. This wave is indeed fierce. Rather than trying to bottom fish, it's better to wait for signals. Right now, all are false breakouts. Friends with full positions, it's time to wake up. Being alive is more important than making money. This statement hits home.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 7h ago

Here we go again, talking about re-pricing... it's just market manipulation after all. This round of liquidity tightening is truly uncomfortable. Is 85,000 really the life-and-death line? Feels like a 4 billion outflow isn't harsh enough. The trajectory is a bit off; I have to wait for a clear signal from the ground command before boarding the ship. I'd rather miss out than make a mistake. I need to get that tattooed—full position is the shortest path to a bankruptcy rocket. Policy uncertainty is the biggest unknown. Right now, anyone who dares to go all-in is a true warrior... or just a gambler.

View OriginalReply0