2025-12-29 20:23:10

Many people in crypto communities keep saying "To the moon," but they don't understand what true consensus really means.

My understanding is simple—consensus is not shouted out, it's made.

This is how the consensus for the Max project was formed. We are not only discussing how to improve the allocation of educational resources through blockchain technology, but more importantly, we have truly crossed borders and solved the logistical challenges of international donations. When the first thank-you report from the beneficiary school appeared before us, everyone knew in that moment—we are not just hyping concepts; we are making a difference.

Projects like GiggleAcademy are able to unite people's hearts precisely because participants share a common memory of action. Overcoming difficulties and witnessing results together with a group of strangers creates bonds that cannot be spoken of—they can only be made.

To put it simply, what we have done together defines what kind of people we are. This is the most valuable thing in the crypto community.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RektRecovery

· 1h ago

ngl this "consensus through action" thing sounds nice until you realize max and giggleacademy are probably just the next ones to get rekt. seen this play before.

Reply0

potentially_notable

· 1h ago

This is what I've always wanted to say—what's the use of just shouting "moon"? Only projects that are truly grounded in doing the work are worth following. Max's cross-border donation operation was truly outstanding. I was also touched by that gratitude report, not the typical "harvesting" approach. Changing something together with a group of strangers—this feeling really can't be compared.

View OriginalReply0

probably_nothing_anon

· 1h ago

You're right, just shouting "moon" is useless... real results come from actually doing things. Exactly, I've seen too many project teams just hype up their projects, but in the end, nothing changes. Max is the kind of person who follows through, and that's worth working with. The term "action memory" is brilliant, truly different.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 2h ago

tbh the whole "shared action memory" thing is just governance theater if you don't have proper incentive alignment mechanisms built in... what happens when the coordination breaks down?

Reply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 2h ago

Really, just shouting "moon" is useless; you need to see what you've actually done.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdviser

· 2h ago

Action is the strongest consensus; I'm already tired of the pie on paper. Really, compared to those projects that boast every day, I only feel it when real changes happen. People who get things done will naturally attract followers.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 2h ago

Actions speak louder than words, and that is the direction I support. Only projects that make real changes can truly attract me; empty talk about coins is pointless. Consensus depends on actual implementation; Max's international donation process is indeed solid. Not all teams dare to genuinely use the money for the right purposes; the difference is huge. There are too many virtual promises; those quietly improving the system are actually more trustworthy. GiggleAcademy's model reminds me of the early days of pure community spirit, which is rare. People who have gone through hardships together won't deceive you; that's more reliable than any white paper. People who get things done will naturally be noticed by others who do things. The most talkative are often the ones with the least achievements; this rule is very accurate.

View OriginalReply0