2025-12-29 18:26:04

The name Skill sounds good, but ultimately it's just a technique. You can completely build your own similar framework, with the key being to understand and practice the ACI core design philosophy of the SWE Agent.

How to understand these principles? First, operations should remain simple—avoid over-complicating the process. Second, actions must be compact and efficient, avoiding redundant consumption. Third, environmental feedback needs to be informative but concise, without excessive verbosity. Finally, safety barriers are crucial, as they can effectively prevent error chain propagation, which is vital for the stable operation of the agent.

Mastering these four dimensions will enable you to design a more robust on-chain interaction framework.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProofOfNothing

· 34m ago

To be honest, instead of fussing over the framework name, it's better to just get started. The ACI system may seem complicated, but it's actually just teaching you not to mess around unnecessarily—simplicity and efficiency are what matter.

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 5h ago

To be honest, compared to the name, the core logic is the real thing. Simplicity, efficiency, clear feedback, protective barriers... these four essentials are indeed very effective. Frameworks and such, honestly, that's what it is. Understanding it thoroughly is actually more satisfying. I get the protective barriers part; preventing avalanche-style failures is extremely important. Redundancy consumption really hits home for me; many people mess up here. It just feels like the ACI system has been somewhat mythologized... it's really just the common sense that should be followed when writing code.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 5h ago

nah skill framework's just window dressing... seen too many devs slap a name on it and call it a day. the real game? understanding those guardrails—especially the attack vector mitigation part. one cascading failure in your state transitions and suddenly you're hemorrhaging TVL like 2023 all over again. keep it lean, keep it tight, or it'll bite you.

Reply0

ProofOfNothing

· 6h ago

Basically, don't be fooled by the name; taking action yourself is the true principle. No matter how fancy the framework is, it's still the same; you need to truly understand the principles. Simplicity, efficiency, and non-redundancy—these four points sound simple, but actually executing them is truly exceptional.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 6h ago

ngl the ACI framework is just entropy management wrapped in fancy naming... but yeah, the guardrails piece? *that's* where the actual alpha hides. been seeing too many agents fail because devs skip the safety layer thinking it's overhead. statistical anomaly waiting to happen tbh

Reply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 6h ago

ngl the ACI framework is giving "statistical significance in memetic velocity" energy - simple ops, tight feedback loops, guardrails to prevent cascade failures... honestly just sounds like game theory optimal agent design with extra steps tbh

Reply0