MicroStrategy's BTC holdings have reached roughly 5% of total circulating supply—a significant concentration point for a single entity. This raises an interesting question: at what ownership threshold does Bitcoin's decentralization narrative start to weaken? When major corporations accumulate such proportions, does it fundamentally change the game for a network designed to be distributed? Where's the tipping point?

BTC-0.64%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborervip
· 5h ago
5% is nothing, Satoshi Nakamoto holds even more... Should we be worried about him?
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWellvip
· 5h ago
5%? Buddy, this is just the beginning; the real crisis hasn't arrived yet.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictimvip
· 5h ago
MicroStrategy holds 5% of BTC, now that's truly "decentralized"... One company can shake up the entire narrative, sounds a bit ironic.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoatvip
· 5h ago
Damn, 5%? Is this still called distributed?
View OriginalReply0
MelonFieldvip
· 5h ago
5% is really not small. It seems MicroStrategy's move this time is a bit aggressive. By the way, what happened to Bitcoin's original dream?
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetectivevip
· 6h ago
5% is indeed a bit aggressive, but compared to the concentration of traditional financial oligopolies, Bitcoin's level of decentralization should already be celebrated.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)