2025-12-29 15:24:37

After a decade of exploration and refinement, Faraday Future has turned its design blueprints into real road-ready vehicles. Now, the team is attempting a more imaginative approach—launching a globally pioneering electric vehicle RWA protocol.

This time, it's not just a simple fundraising story. The core mechanism involves bringing a $500 million real vehicle pre-order asset pool onto the blockchain, allowing participants to directly share in the value growth generated by subsequent deliveries. What makes this different is that it's not just a paper promise; it's backed by genuine order assets.

Participants can stake corresponding tokens to earn an annualized return of 20%-50%. This yield comes from the distribution mechanism of vehicle sales revenue. Meanwhile, the entire ecosystem is governed by a DAO—key decisions are made through voting. Participants who purchase vehicles with tokens can enjoy discounts, and there are also priority rights for new model launches.

The project's logic is as follows: expanding from a $100 million market cap to $10 billion, each vehicle delivery triggers a mechanism that theoretically boosts the overall ecosystem's value. This model is at least mathematically traceable for participants, with a relatively transparent growth path.

For those interested in the integration of the electric vehicle industry and blockchain, this case is worth observing—it demonstrates how RWA can be integrated into consumer-grade products, enabling users to shift from passive consumers to co-builders of the ecosystem.

RWA-4.95%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

On-ChainDiver

· 9h ago

Wait, 20%-50% annualized return? That number sounds a bit suspicious. Can it really be achieved?

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 9h ago

Speaking of the logic of bringing real assets on-chain, it still depends on whether the subsequent delivery can keep up... Wait, isn't the 20%-50% annualized return a bit suspicious? Faraday's approach this time is indeed different from traditional fundraising tactics, but the logic of deflation driving up ecosystem value... I feel a bit familiar. Backed by real orders sounds good, but I'm worried that the orders themselves might just be vapor. This is what RWA should be doing—consumer goods + on-chain governance, which is indeed interesting.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentSage

· 9h ago

Oops, 20%-50% annualized returns? That number sounds outrageous. Can order assets really be that valuable? --- RWA + automakers, this idea is good, but delivery is the key. Talking on paper is pointless. --- DAO governance sounds democratic, but in reality? Major investors still hold all the voting power. --- Faraday wants to play for real this time, but the real question is whether it can reach a market cap of 10 billion. --- Both deflation and annualized figures, the hype is at its peak. But what about actual delivery volume? --- Putting orders on the chain as endorsement—this idea I have to admit is smarter than just fundraising stories. --- Staking tokens to share sales revenue, the logic is sound. Just worried about it ending in a flop later. --- Real-world assets (RWA) for consumer use cases are finally landing. Honestly, this is an experimental field worth watching.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 9h ago

Damn, a 500 million dollar order directly on the blockchain? This is the way RWA should be played. --- Wait, 20-50% annualized? The numbers only count if they are truly delivered, otherwise it's just another air coin scheme. --- Ten years of sharpening the sword, finally not just PPT car manufacturing. This time, there's real money backing it. --- DAO governance + car purchase discounts, it’s about binding users tightly while making them feel like they’re earning. There’s definitely something there. --- Putting real order pools on the blockchain is indeed innovative. Compared to those vague promises, this approach at least dares to be transparent. --- From 100 million to 10 billion, each delivery is missing... The idea looks good, but it depends on whether subsequent orders can meet expectations. --- Interesting, but the key is whether the cars can really be sold. Otherwise, even the best mechanism is just an illusion. --- RWA empowering consumer-grade products, Faraday has found a new space for imagination this time. Worth pondering. --- Revenue comes from vehicle sales, which is much more honest than projects that keep issuing tokens endlessly, but the risks are real too. --- Priority purchase rights sound great, but the prerequisite is that the new cars must actually be valuable.

View OriginalReply0