2025-12-29 15:22:20

Morpho's curator model was exposed to a fatal flaw during the Stream Finance collapse—users lost everything, yet the platform still collected a 15% fee, and the accountability mechanism was virtually nonexistent. This incident directly accelerated the architectural shift to v4, which plans to completely abolish the curator hierarchy in Q1 and instead adopt an intent-matching mechanism to reconstruct liquidity management.

From market reactions, although Morpho has locked assets totaling $639M, it still lags several times behind Aave's $4B market cap. Interestingly, mainstream platforms like Coinbase are already handling over $1.5B in Bitcoin lending through DeFi channels, indicating that market demand for decentralized finance is accelerating. The key question is whether the product's own risk control can keep pace with this growth.

Whether Morpo v4's decentralized curator design can truly avoid risks and restore user confidence will be crucial in determining whether it can narrow the gap with leading protocols.

AAVE-2.27%

BTC-0.69%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

JustHereForAirdrops

· 8h ago

Laughing to death, luckily I didn't heavily invest in Morpho... Wait, do I have any? --- The curator system, this thing should have been cut long ago. Charging fees and making users take the blame, what a garbage design. --- $639M vs Aave's $4B, the gap is indeed huge. How can I catch up now? --- If v4 can really handle risk control through intent matching, that would be revolutionary. But I'm still a bit skeptical... --- Honestly, the Stream incident shattered Morpho's trust completely. Can v4 turn things around this time? --- The platform still charges fees even when users lose money—that logic is incredible. Who designed this system? --- Coinbase's $1.5B lending business moving into DeFi shows there's strong market demand. The key is whether the product is reliable. --- Just want to see if Morpho v4 can make a comeback, or else it will really become a part of history textbooks.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityWorker

· 8h ago

It's another big show of "I lose money and you just pay the fee," this routine is really getting tired. --- Whether v4 can save the situation depends, but this time it indeed slapped in the face. --- 640M vs 4 billion, such a huge gap, can it be caught up with just an architecture upgrade? I don't believe it. --- The saying that risk control can't keep up with growth is so true. Every time, we fall flat on our faces and then realize. --- Coinbase has started playing DeFi, which shows that the demand is indeed there, but I don't know if Morpho can seize this opportunity. --- The curator mode is just a pseudo-decentralization; it should have been cut long ago. --- Losing all your capital but still having to pay the fee? Ridiculous, no one can come up with such logic. --- If you still can't figure out Q1, it seems users should have already left. --- Accountability mechanisms are just a paper tiger; without real punishment mechanisms, any changes are useless.

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 9h ago

Ha, the curator mode crashed and they still dare to charge fees, this move is really bold. ---- The thing with Stream shows that decentralization doesn't mean zero risk. ---- Wait, can v4 really whitewash this black history? I'm a bit skeptical. ---- $639M vs $4B, such a huge gap, do users really dare to keep playing? ---- Intent matching sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just another empty promise. ---- Coinbase is also doing DeFi lending, the market is really heating up. ---- The problem is that risk control can't keep up. If there's another collapse, who will pay? ---- Charging a 15% fee still, their heart is really big.

View OriginalReply0

AlgoAlchemist

· 9h ago

Seeing the 15% fee still being charged, it's truly incredible... That's why I don't touch the curator mode. --- V4 abolishing the curator hierarchy? Sounds good, but it all depends on execution. Don’t let it turn into another PPT project. --- Morpho's 600 million locked compared to Aave's 4 billion, the gap is indeed outrageous. It depends on whether v4 can turn things around. --- Intent matching sounds good, but risk control has always been the Achilles' heel of DeFi. --- Bitcoin lending reaching 1.5 billion? That shows market demand is real, but Morpho needs to fix bugs quickly or there really won't be a chance. --- Accountability being a mere formality is the harshest. Once trust is broken, how can it be rebuilt? --- It's another Q1 delivery. I just want to ask, will it be on time this time... --- Honestly, users losing their entire investment depends on the platform's attitude. This is the current state of DeFi.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainSniper

· 9h ago

Here is the translation: Once again, same old trick. When there's a crash, they change the architecture. What about users' funds? --- Curation system is just a joke. Risk control can't keep up, yet they still dare to charge fees. Outrageous. --- $639M vs $4B, such a big gap, still want to turn things around? It depends on whether v4 can really improve. --- Intent matching sounds good, but the problem is trust has already been shattered. --- Coinbase is already doing DeFi lending. MorphO needs to prove quickly that it’s not the next explosion case. --- That Stream incident is ridiculous. Money is gone, but fees are still collected. What is this, decentralization? --- Is v4 reliable? Or is it just another new trick to cut leeks? --- The key is whether there will be real accountability later; otherwise, it’s just on paper. --- DeFi demand is so high, but MorphO is internal fighting, and Aave has taken all the opportunities.

View OriginalReply0