2025-12-29 15:10:40

Large inflows often lead to adjustments, and this pattern has occurred several times before, serving as a short-term trading reference. The most recent transfer is quite interesting — a leading asset management institution just transferred 2201 BTC (worth about $192 million) and 7557 ETH (about $22.12 million) to a compliant custody platform. What does this kind of large movement usually indicate? Historical data shows that similar on-chain transfers are often followed by short-term market corrections. So if you're planning to increase your position, be cautious at this moment and avoid blindly going long. The key is to observe the price reaction over the next 24-48 hours to see if it repeats the previous pattern.

BTC-0.64%

ETH-0.41%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SadMoneyMeow

· 7h ago

Here we go again with this set? Large transfers = market manipulation, I'm already tired of hearing this logic. Wait, 2201 Bitcoins... this number seems a bit deliberate. Short-term correction? What are you afraid of, I've been numb to being trapped for a long time. It sounds good to call it "caution," but it's actually just cowardice. What can you see within 24 hours? That's nonsense. History repeating? The history of the crypto world is just two words—bloodshed. I bet on the opposite side. When big players enter, I go against the trend. Let's see who gets wiped out faster this round. Blindly adding positions really doesn't work.

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 7h ago

Large institutions move, and the market trembles. We'll have to wait and see how this plays out again.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 7h ago

Coming with the same story again? Large institutions transferring coins = about to dump the market. I stopped believing this logic a long time ago. Wait, 2201 BTC directly into custody? This guy really plans to stay flat for the long term. 24-hour observation period? Forget it, I've already gotten in. Love to fall, fall all you want. This pattern always claims to be effective, but what’s the result? Counter-operation is the real winning strategy. Institutional custody entry ≠ sell signal. Why do some people always get it mixed up? I just want to ask, will this pullback really happen? Or is it another "wolf is coming" scenario?

View OriginalReply0