🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
From the perspective of first principles, the wave of on-chain asset securitization is taking shape. On-chain stocks, as the first phase of experimentation, have already shown some results, but I believe the real breakthrough lies in on-chain equity — this is the core issue that the entire ecosystem aims to solve.
However, the majority of people are more concerned not with these innovations themselves, but with a more practical question: Is the platform reliable? What if it runs away with the funds? This issue hits close to home, so I will prioritize discussing it.
Honestly, this is the watershed that determines whether users will truly get on board. No matter how good the product design is, if the platform behind it lacks security guarantees and credit backing, everything is just empty talk. What we need to look at are: How is the platform’s risk control system? What is the fund escrow plan? Is there third-party auditing? Is the governance mechanism transparent? These hard indicators directly determine whether a platform is worth participating in.
The potential of on-chain equity is vast, but the prerequisite is that users are willing to entrust their assets with confidence. Platform security must be top-notch — it not only concerns individual asset safety but also the confidence foundation of the entire sector. Without this foundation, all innovations will seem hollow.